Noether identities for variational symmetries
Derive conserved quantities from smooth continuous symmetries and identify exactly where the Euler–Lagrange equation is used.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Derive a conserved momentum from a vertical variational symmetry.
- Derive the energy identity for an autonomous Lagrangian.
- Distinguish an identity off a solution from conservation along a solution.
A differential equation may contain a conserved quantity that reduces its effective complexity. Variational symmetries explain why certain conserved quantities arise together: translating an absent position coordinate conserves momentum, and translating an absent independent coordinate conserves an energy-like quantity. The useful statement is not merely that symmetry causes conservation. A short identity shows the derivative of the candidate charge equals a term involving the Euler–Lagrange residual. It vanishes on stationary solutions under the declared smoothness and invariance assumptions, while also providing a diagnostic when a numerical curve is only approximately stationary.
A vertical symmetry gives an off-solution identity
Take a smooth Lagrangian and a smooth one-parameter change of the dependent variable that leaves the independent coordinate fixed. Let its infinitesimal generator be . Assume the density is invariant to first order for every nearby position and slope, not just on a particular candidate curve. Differentiating invariance gives . This is a statement about the Lagrangian before imposing its equations of motion.
Write the momentum as evaluated along a twice continuously differentiable curve. Differentiating and using the invariance identity yields . The factor in parentheses is the negative of the Euler–Lagrange residual. Therefore the charge is constant on a stationary curve. For vector-valued dependent variables, replace products by the corresponding dot products. Smooth transformations that change the density by a total derivative require an additional boundary-charge correction; strict invariance is the simpler case proved here.
Translation of the independent coordinate gives energy
Suppose the Lagrangian has no explicit dependence on the interval coordinate. Define . Its total derivative is , obtained by the product and chain rules. On a stationary curve the first term vanishes, and autonomy makes the second vanish. Thus energy is conserved. For a mechanical Lagrangian equal to kinetic minus potential energy with a standard quadratic kinetic term, this expression is the familiar kinetic plus potential energy. For a general Lagrangian it is a derived conserved expression rather than an automatically positive physical energy.
The independent variable need not be time: in a spatial variational problem the same identity is often called the Beltrami first integral. If explicit coordinate dependence remains, the identity instead gives the rate of change on solutions. A finite interval with fixed endpoints need not be globally invariant under a time translation as a boundary-value problem; the local conservation identity follows from the density symmetry and equation along the interior curve. Boundary data determine which solution and which value of the conserved constant occur.
Use conservation without overclaiming minimality
A cyclic coordinate is absent from the Lagrangian itself, so its partial derivative is zero and its momentum is constant. In a planar central potential, rotational symmetry similarly gives angular momentum: the generator is the ninety-degree rotation of the position, and its dot product with momentum is the planar cross product. These statements use differentiable continuous symmetries. A discrete symmetry can relate solutions without producing this first-order Noether charge, because it has no infinitesimal generator of the required kind.
Conservation is compatible with minima, maxima, and saddle-type stationary trajectories. The oscillatory action can conserve mechanical energy while failing to be minimal over long time intervals. Dissipative equations introduce another distinction: a damped oscillator's mechanical energy decreases, so the conservative autonomous Lagrangian used here does not describe that damped model unchanged. Specialized variational formulations can handle such systems, but cannot be inferred by silently adding friction to the conservative conservation proof. Always check the actual equation and the exact symmetry being invoked.
Work it through
Free motion from two conserved quantities
For on the time interval , require . Find the stationary trajectory, its conserved momentum, and its energy.
The dependent variable is absent, so the Euler–Lagrange equation gives with . The stationary path has constant velocity and is affine in time.
The endpoint displacement is three over a time of two, giving velocity 3/2 and trajectory u(t) = 3t/2. Its momentum for the unit-mass Lagrangian is 3/2.
The Lagrangian is autonomous, so is constant. Direct substitution verifies both identities at every interior time.
The path is u(t) = 1.5t, with momentum 1.5 and energy 1.125. The derivative-energy convexity can separately certify minimality for these endpoints.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · oscillator
Check conservation and its failure under damping
Reset and set both damping and frequency . Predict from the displayed position and velocity; Step twice to time one and check. Reset and set both ; predict nonincreasing mechanical energy with derivative . Compute it from the readouts. This comparison uses two different equations; it does not treat damping as a symmetry of the conservative action.
- Displacement x(t)
- 1
- Velocity v(t)
- 0
- Regime
- underdamped
Unit mass, x(0) = 1 and v(0) = 0. The analytic solution includes underdamped, critically damped and overdamped cases; time is measured in seconds. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA conserved charge is tied to a specific equation and symmetry, not merely a familiar curve shape.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For , verify that is stationary and calculate its conserved energy.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Derive the equation before substituting the proposed trajectory. Then use the identity for sine squared plus cosine squared.
Compare with the solution
The equation is , satisfied by the proposed cosine. Energy is . This proves conservation along the stationary curve; it does not prove a minimum for arbitrary endpoint-time choices.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- A variational symmetry yields an identity involving the Euler–Lagrange residual.
- Autonomy conserves u′Fᵥ − F along stationary curves.
- Conservation does not establish minimality or automatically survive a changed equation.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.