advanced31 min studyLesson 694 in Mathematics

Subgaussian variables and Orlicz norms

Separate a centered mgf variance proxy from an uncentered Orlicz norm and compute the constants in elementary examples.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Specify the factor-two Luxemburg normalization of ψ₁ and ψ₂ norms.
  • Distinguish a subgaussian mgf proxy, variance, and Orlicz norm.
  • Compute Rademacher and Gaussian examples and combine independent subgaussian variables.

Calling a variable subgaussian describes a family of equivalent tail and moment properties, but numerical parameters depend on the definition. A centered mgf proxy is convenient for sums, while an Orlicz norm measures exponential integrability without first subtracting the mean. Confusing their constants can spoil an otherwise valid tail calculation. Explicit Rademacher and Gaussian computations reveal why these quantities are comparable rather than automatically equal.

A centered mgf proxy is not simply the variance

For a centered X, call σ² a subgaussian variance proxy if log E exp(λX)≤σ²λ²/2 for every real λ. Chernoff optimization gives a one-sided bound exp(−t²/(2σ²)) and twice that value for two sides. Differentiating near zero shows Var(X)≤σ², but a variable's actual variance need not itself be a valid global proxy. A rare bounded outlier can have small variance while its large-λ mgf needs a larger quadratic envelope.

For independent centered X_i with proxies σ_i², a weighted sum with deterministic coefficients a_i has proxy Σa_i²σ_i². This follows by factoring its mgf and substituting λa_i, including negative coefficients because the hypothesis covers every real λ. Without independence this squared-sum formula is not justified. If all terms are the same random sign, their weighted sum fluctuates at the sum of weights scale rather than at the square-root-of-squares scale. Dependence cannot be repaired by a marginal subgaussian label.

log⁡EeλXi≤σi2λ22⟹log⁡Eeλ∑iaiXi≤λ22∑iai2σi2\log\mathbb E e^{\lambda X_i}\le\frac{\sigma_i^2\lambda^2}{2}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\log\mathbb E e^{\lambda\sum_i a_iX_i}\le\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\sum_i a_i^2\sigma_i^2
The Xᵢ are independent and centered, the coefficients are deterministic, and each mgf bound holds for all real λ.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Fix the Orlicz normalization before comparing constants

For α equal to one or two, define the ψ_α norm as the infimum of c>0 for which E exp((|X|/c)^α)≤2. The choice two is part of the convention. Changing it changes exact norm values, even though the same distributions retain finite norm. Unlike the centered mgf proxy, this definition applies directly to a noncentered variable and responds to a deterministic offset. A nonzero constant therefore has positive Orlicz norm despite having zero centered variance proxy.

A finite ψ₂ norm is equivalent, up to universal constants, to a Gaussian-shaped two-sided tail and to square-root growth of L^p norms. For a centered variable it is also equivalent to a global quadratic mgf bound, again with constants. A finite ψ₁ norm gives exponential tails and linear moment growth, connecting to the previous lesson's local-mgf subexponential class after centering. These equivalences do not identify the best mgf proxy with the square of the Orlicz norm; computing one quantity does not authorize dropping the conversion factor.

∥X∥ψα=inf⁡{c>0:Eexp⁡(∣X∣αcα)≤2},α∈{1,2}\|X\|_{\psi_\alpha}=\inf\left\{c>0:\mathbb E\exp\left(\frac{|X|^\alpha}{c^\alpha}\right)\le2\right\},\qquad \alpha\in\{1,2\}
This is the factor-two Luxemburg convention. ψ₂ concerns subgaussian integrability and ψ₁ subexponential integrability, without implicit centering.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Elementary distributions calibrate the definitions

A symmetric sign ε takes values ±1 with equal probabilities. Its mgf is cosh(λ), bounded by exp(λ²/2), and the second derivative at zero makes proxy one optimal. Since ε² is identically one, its ψ₂ norm is one divided by the square root of log two. Both are exact calculations, and the unequal constants already disprove automatic equality of proxy and squared norm. Multiplication by a deterministic scalar scales the norm by its absolute value and the proxy by its square.

For a centered Gaussian of variance τ², the mgf is exactly exp(τ²λ²/2). A separate Gaussian integral gives E exp(G²/c²)=(1−2τ²/c²)^(−1/2) when c²>2τ², with divergence otherwise. Solving the factor-two threshold yields ψ₂ norm sqrt(8/3) times τ. This domain restriction is another instance of the first lesson's rule: the quadratic exponential integral cannot be continued past its finite-moment boundary. It also explains why squaring a Gaussian gives subexponential rather than subgaussian tails.

Three times a random sign

Let X=3ε for a symmetric Rademacher sign. Find its variance, optimal centered mgf proxy, and exact ψ₂ norm under the factor-two convention.

  1. The variable has mean zero and squared value nine, hence variance nine. Its mgf is cosh(3λ), bounded above by exp(9λ²/2), so nine is a valid proxy.

  2. Expanding the log mgf at zero gives second derivative nine. Every global quadratic proxy must dominate this second derivative, so no smaller proxy works and nine is optimal.

  3. For the Orlicz norm, the exponential expectation is exp(9/c²). It is at most two exactly when c²≥9/log2. Thus the norm is 3/√log2≈3.60337, whose square is larger than nine.

The result

Variance and optimal proxy both equal nine in this example, while the exact ψ₂ norm is 3/√log2. Their agreement here does not extend automatically to other distributions.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · probability

Signs encoded by binomial counts

Pause and Reset, then set p = 0.5 and n = 1. Transform each possible count K into ε=2K−1; predict a centered sign with variance proxy one. Reset and set both p = 0.5 and n = 2. Now 2K−2 is a sum of two independent signs, with probabilities 1/4,1/2,1/4 at −2,0,2 and variance proxy two. The instrument displays K, so apply this affine transformation on paper; it does not display Orlicz norms or estimate them from samples.

Signs encoded by binomial countsThese are exact binomial probabilities for independent trials with one fixed success probability. Playback tours the distribution; it does not resample outcomes. Current readings: Mean · np: 5; Variance · np(1−p): 2.5; Total probability: 1. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.03581000.070.150.220.3Successes kP(X = k)k = 0 · P = 9.77e-4
Exact probabilityHighlighted outcomeMean np
Mean · np
5
Variance · np(1−p)
2.5
Total probability
1
t = 0 s

These are exact binomial probabilities for independent trials with one fixed success probability. Playback tours the distribution; it does not resample outcomes. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forIndependent signs add squared proxy scales, while the Orlicz norm remains a separately normalized quantity.

Check your understanding

Which statement correctly relates the factor-two ψ₂ norm and a centered mgf proxy?

Try it yourself

Let G be standard normal and X=2G. Compute the optimal mgf proxy, exact ψ₂ norm, and the two-sided subgaussian upper bound for P(|X|≥4).

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Its variance is four. In the squared-exponential integral replace τ² by four, then solve (1−8/c²)^(−1/2)≤2.

Compare with the solution

The optimal mgf proxy is four because EeλX=e2λ2\mathbb E e^{\lambda X}=e^{2\lambda^2}. The squared-exponential integral is finite for c²>8 and equals (1−8/c2)−1/2(1-8/c^2)^{-1/2}. The threshold at two gives c²≥32/3, so the exact ψ₂ norm is sqrt(32/3)≈3.26599. The mgf tail bound at four is 2e−16/(2⋅4)=2e−2≈0.2706712e^{-16/(2\cdot4)}=2e^{-2}\approx0.270671. The actual Gaussian probability is about 0.04550, showing again that an optimal quadratic mgf proxy need not make Chernoff's probability bound exact.

Take it with you

  • A global centered mgf bound uses a variance proxy, which need not equal the actual variance.
  • The factor-two Orlicz norm is uncentered and has its own exact constants.
  • Independent weighted sums combine squared mgf proxy scales; dependence requires another argument.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.