Lipschitz existence and pathwise uniqueness
Use Picard iteration and stopped moment estimates without confusing local solvability with nonexplosion.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- State finite-horizon Lipschitz and growth hypotheses precisely.
- Explain the Picard and Gronwall estimates behind well-posedness.
- Distinguish local uniqueness from a guarantee of global nonexplosion.
Globally Lipschitz coefficients give a reliable existence and uniqueness theorem, but the role of each assumption matters. Lipschitz control compares nearby solutions; growth control prevents a solution from escaping to infinity in finite time. We consider a finite-dimensional Itô equation on a given Brownian filtered space satisfying the usual conditions, with a square-integrable initial variable measurable at time zero. The coefficients below are deterministic and Borel measurable in time and space.
Uniform hypotheses on each finite horizon
For each finite horizon, require a common Lipschitz constant for drift and diffusion as functions of the state, uniformly over time up to that horizon. Use Euclidean norm for the drift and Hilbert–Schmidt norm for the diffusion matrix. Also require at most linear growth in the state with a finite horizon-dependent constant. The latter follows from global Lipschitz control if the coefficient values at zero are uniformly bounded on that horizon, but should not be silently omitted when those values have not been controlled.
Under these hypotheses, the equation has a unique continuous adapted strong solution with a finite expected squared supremum on the horizon. Applying the statement consistently on longer horizons gives a nonexplosive global solution. The constants may depend on the horizon; no claim of a time-uniform moment bound or an invariant distribution follows. A process can be globally defined while its moments grow exponentially, as happens for a linear equation with positive drift.
Iteration and comparison use the same estimates
Picard iteration starts with the initial value as a constant process and repeatedly substitutes the preceding approximation into both integrals. Cauchy–Schwarz controls the drift integral, while Itô isometry and a martingale maximal inequality control the stochastic integral. Lipschitz continuity turns the resulting difference estimate into an integral of the preceding difference. Repeating this estimate gives factorial decay on a bounded horizon, producing a limit in expected squared supremum and allowing the equation to pass to that limit.
For two solutions driven by the same Brownian motion, the identical estimates bound their expected squared difference by a constant times its own time integral, plus the initial difference. Gronwall's inequality forces equality when the initial variables agree and gives quantitative continuous dependence otherwise. The noise terms cannot simply be canceled for a general state-dependent diffusion coefficient: they have the same Brownian driver but different integrands. The Lipschitz estimate, rather than literal cancellation, is what closes the argument.
Local conditions require an explosion check
Locally Lipschitz coefficients permit truncation outside expanding balls. The resulting global solutions agree before their exit times by uniqueness, giving a maximal local solution. Its lifetime is the limit of those exit times. Local Lipschitz regularity alone does not force that lifetime to be infinite: the deterministic equation with drift equal to the square of the state already explodes from a positive initial value. Smoothness does not compensate for uncontrolled growth.
Linear growth, or an appropriate Lyapunov estimate, supplies a separate nonexplosion argument. Stopped moment bounds make the probability of leaving a large ball before a fixed time tend to zero, after which the stopping levels can be removed. Conversely, failure of a sufficient Lipschitz condition does not prove nonuniqueness. Some less regular diffusions remain well posed through sharper one-dimensional arguments. A theorem's hypotheses are a usable sufficient criterion, rather than a complete classification of every solvable coefficient.
Work it through
Check a nonlinear coefficient pair
Consider with square-integrable initial data. Give explicit Lipschitz and growth bounds, then state the conclusions justified by them.
The drift derivative is , whose absolute value is at most three. The diffusion derivative is , whose absolute value is at most one half. The mean-value theorem therefore supplies a combined Lipschitz constant .
The drift magnitude is at most , and the diffusion magnitude is at most . Their sum is at most , which is bounded by . This is a global linear-growth bound.
The coefficients are continuous and deterministic, so the stated measurability and time-uniform conditions hold. The theorem gives a nonexplosive strong solution, pathwise uniqueness, and finite expected squared supremum on every finite horizon.
These bounds establish well-posedness. They do not by themselves compute a transition density, an invariant law, or a time-uniform bound on all moments.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · optimization
A deterministic comparison of contraction factors
Pause/Reset, then set both step size to 0.5 and initial position to 2. Predict successive displayed iterates 2,1,0.5 using Step. Reset and set both step size to 1.5 and initial position to 2; predict 2,−1,0.5. Both have absolute contraction factor one half.
- Position x0
- 2
- Objective x²/2
- 2
- Iteration behavior
- Stable step
Gradient descent on f(x) = x²/2: xₙ = (1 − η)ⁿx₀. Playback advances two discrete iterations per second. Values outside |x| ≤ 4 are explicitly reported. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThe exact quadratic iteration illustrates a quantitative difference bound and the role of its constant. It is neither Picard iteration for an SDE nor an Euler–Maruyama simulation.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Analyze the deterministic special case with and zero diffusion. Find its lifetime and identify the hypothesis missing from the global theorem. Does the example contradict local pathwise uniqueness?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Separate variables while the state is finite and positive, and identify where the resulting denominator vanishes.
Compare with the solution
The solution is for , with explosion at time one half. The drift is locally Lipschitz but has quadratic rather than linear growth and is not globally Lipschitz. Thus the global nonexplosion theorem does not apply. Local uniqueness remains valid up to the lifetime, so the example distinguishes explosion from nonuniqueness rather than contradicting either local construction or its comparison theorem.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Uniform Lipschitz control and a growth bound give a finite-horizon strong theorem.
- Common-driver uniqueness uses estimates when the noise coefficient depends on the state.
- Local solvability and global nonexplosion require different arguments.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.