Lie algebra representations
Represent infinitesimal symmetries through bracket-preserving maps and verify the smallest noncommutative example.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Check the bracket-preservation condition on generators.
- Compute the defining two-dimensional representation of sl₂.
- Distinguish a Lie algebra representation from a global representation of a chosen Lie group.
Continuous symmetries can often be investigated through their infinitesimal generators. Instead of multiplying full group elements, a Lie algebra records a bilinear bracket that measures the first noncommutative interaction of small transformations. A representation realizes that bracket as a commutator of linear operators. This lesson computes the standard three-generator example explicitly, then explains why local algebraic information does not by itself choose the topology of a global symmetry group or settle operator-domain questions in infinite-dimensional physics.
A bracket is extra structure, not ordinary multiplication
A Lie algebra is a vector space equipped with an alternating bilinear bracket satisfying the Jacobi identity. Matrices supply an example with bracket AB−BA. A representation is a linear map from the abstract Lie algebra to endomorphisms of V that sends the abstract bracket to this operator commutator. Linearity matters as much as the bracket law: mapping each named generator to a matrix without extending consistently to linear combinations does not define a representation. One checks generator relations only when the stated presentation really generates all relations needed.
Commuting generators describe mutually compatible infinitesimal directions, whereas nonzero brackets explain why applying two small transformations in opposite orders differs. The Jacobi identity ensures those interactions fit together. It does not mean every nested commutator vanishes. For example, a diagonal matrix can act on an off-diagonal matrix by rescaling its commutator. These algebraic relations constrain spectra and connect eigenvectors into ladders. Their power comes from exact relations rather than a visual resemblance between arrows in a diagram and imagined quantum particles.
Three matrices encode the sl₂ relations
The complex Lie algebra sl₂ consists of two-by-two complex matrices of trace zero. A convenient basis has a diagonal element H and raising and lowering elements E and F. Their commutators satisfy [H,E]=2E, [H,F]=−2F, and [E,F]=H. Because these elements form a basis and the bracket is bilinear, checking those relations verifies the standard defining representation. These are algebra generators acting on a two-dimensional space, not three mutually independent spatial directions with the same geometric interpretation.
If a vector v has H-eigenvalue m, the bracket relation gives H(Ev)=(m+2)Ev whenever Ev is nonzero. Likewise F lowers the eigenvalue by two. In the defining representation, the two weights are 1 and −1; trying to raise beyond the upper vector gives zero. In general finite-dimensional irreducible complex sl₂ representations, a nonnegative integer highest weight determines the familiar finite ladder. Infinite-dimensional modules admit different behavior, so finiteness and irreducibility are substantive assumptions in this classification.
Infinitesimal information has global and analytic limits
Differentiating a smooth finite-dimensional representation of a Lie group gives a Lie algebra representation. Conversely, in the finite-dimensional setting a Lie algebra representation integrates to the connected simply connected Lie group with that algebra. Descending to another group with the same algebra may fail if a covering kernel acts nontrivially. Spinorial representations illustrate this distinction between rotation-related groups. Thus the commutation relations do not erase global topology. A statement about a representation of an algebra should not quietly become a statement about every group sharing that algebra.
Infinite-dimensional representations introduce another boundary. Operators may be unbounded, products may have different domains, and formal commutators need a common invariant domain before they become operator identities. Exponentiation to unitary groups requires analytic hypotheses beyond multiplying symbols. The two-level lab offers a finite complex state with mixing and phase controls, useful for observing that basis probabilities need not determine a state. It is not an sl₂ module classifier or an integration theorem; keeping those distinctions explicit prevents a familiar picture from replacing the actual mathematics.
Work it through
Checking a noncommutative relation entry by entry
Use the displayed matrices H, E, and F to verify [E,F]=H and follow the two basis vectors.
Direct multiplication gives and . Their difference is diag(1,−1)=H.
For e₁=(1,0) and e₂=(0,1), H gives e₁ and −e₂. The H-weights are therefore 1 and −1.
E sends e₂ to e₁ and sends e₁ to zero; F sends e₁ to e₂ and sends e₂ to zero. The nonzero steps change the weight by exactly two.
An invariant nonzero subspace stable under H contains a weight direction; E and F then produce both directions. Consequently the defining complex representation is irreducible.
The explicit commutator agrees with the algebra relation, and the two weight directions form one irreducible sl₂ module.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · quantum
A complex two-component state
Predict whether changing only relative phase φ changes basis probabilities, then adjust φ and mixing angle θ and compare those probabilities with the Bloch coordinates. The state is cos(θ/2)|0⟩+exp(iφ)sin(θ/2)|1⟩. This shows finite-state coordinates, not the E/F weight ladder, representation classification, or an infinite-dimensional operator domain.
- Probability |0⟩
- 71.1%
- Probability |1⟩
- 28.9%
- Bloch (x, y, z)
- 0.78, 0.45, 0.42
A normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forComplex state coordinates can be inspected explicitly, while generator relations still require algebraic verification.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Using H=diag(1,−1) and the displayed E, calculate HE and EH and verify [H,E]=2E.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Left multiplication scales rows; right multiplication scales columns.
Compare with the solution
HE=E because the nonzero entry lies in the first row. EH=−E because it lies in the second column. Hence HE−EH=2E. This concrete calculation checks both the sign and the factor of two used in the weight-shift formula.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Representations preserve Lie brackets through operator commutators.
- The sl₂ relations create weight shifts and allow exact small computations.
- Global group topology and unbounded-operator domains require information beyond formal commutation relations.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.