Descend from a characteristic polynomial to a Ward variation
Track form degree, normalization, and the distinction between consistent and covariant anomalies in an explicit Abelian example.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Identify the six-, five-, and four-form roles in a four-dimensional anomaly.
- Compute an Abelian descent with explicit factors of 2π.
- Distinguish effective-action consistency from covariant-current redefinitions.
Anomaly polynomials organize local quantum obstructions using characteristic forms. In four spacetime dimensions, the relevant polynomial has degree six; it is not an ordinary six-form integrated over physical four-dimensional spacetime. A local descent produces a five-form and then a four-form containing the gauge parameter. The last object gives the anomalous variation of the generating functional, with normalization and current convention doing as much work as the compact geometry.
Fix the charge and characteristic-class normalization
Use natural units and a compact Abelian connection a normalized so unit charge has covariant derivative . Its curvature is locally, and represents the first Chern class. Matter has integer charges q in this normalization. For bookkeeping, assign the displayed anomaly polynomial to a left-handed complex Weyl fermion; opposite chirality contributes its negative. This declaration fixes the overall anomaly sign, which otherwise changes between chirality, orientation, and effective-action conventions in different references.
The polynomial follows from the degree-six part of . The Chern character expands as and the gravitational factor begins with . Multiplying and retaining total form degree six gives a cubic gauge term and a mixed gauge-gravitational term. Here is a four-form, so its product with x has the required degree. A charge sum that cancels the cubic term need not cancel the gravitational term.
Perform the local descent
Set gravitational curvature to zero to isolate the Abelian example. Locally, the closed six-form is the exterior derivative of a Chern–Simons five-form proportional to . Under , its variation is the exterior derivative of a four-form proportional to . Each step lowers the spacetime form degree by one while increasing the dependence on the transformation parameter. The construction is local on connection patches; a globally defined potential is not assumed on every nontrivial bundle.
Define the generating-functional phase by . This fixes the otherwise easy-to-miss factor connecting the normalized characteristic polynomial to the physical Ward variation. Changing a local counterterm can change the descent representative by a trivial variation, but cannot remove a nontrivial anomaly class. Statements about finite large transformations require additional global information; exponentiating an infinitesimal local formula without that information is not a general global-anomaly calculation.
Do not interchange consistent and covariant currents
The consistent current is obtained by functional differentiation of the effective action. Its anomaly satisfies the Wess–Zumino consistency condition expressing the gauge-transformation algebra. Adding a Bardeen–Zumino local polynomial to the current produces a covariant current whose transformation properties are simpler. That current generally is not the derivative of the same local effective action. For a single four-dimensional Abelian chiral current, the covariant anomaly coefficient is three times its consistent coefficient; the distinction cannot be discarded during descent.
This factor does not mean that a physical obstruction has tripled. The two currents are different local representatives of the same anomaly data and include different contact terms. Nor should the single-Weyl formula be compared directly with a Dirac axial identity after imposing exact vector conservation, which allocates anomalies differently among currents. The polynomial is best used as a compact invariant organizing cancellation and matching, while current-level calculations state separately which representative and background symmetries they preserve.
Work it through
A charge-two local descent
Consider one left-handed charge-two Weyl fermion in a flat gravitational background. A compactly supported infinitesimal gauge variation has , with small real . Find its polynomial and consistent generating-functional variation.
The cubic charge is , so the gauge polynomial is . The factor six comes from the third-order term in the exponential Chern character, not a fermion multiplicity.
Use the local five-form and its four-form descent with the same factor eight. Multiplying by gives coefficient in front of the stated background integral.
Thus . This is an infinitesimal consistent variation; replacing its coefficient by the covariant one would no longer compute the same effective-action variation.
The flat-background anomaly polynomial is 4x³/3 and the specified infinitesimal generating-functional variation is iε. No claim about a finite large gauge transformation follows from this local calculation alone.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
Check linearity of a chosen representative
Reset and set both controls to coefficient a = 1 and position x = 1; predict signed area 1/3. Reset and set both controls to a = 2 and x = 1; predict area 2/3. The exact integral of y = ax² illustrates linear scaling with an overall coefficient. It does not manipulate differential forms, Chern classes, gauge parameters, or anomaly descent, and is not a derivation of the six-to-five-to-four form construction.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forOnce a representative and normalization are fixed, its overall coefficient scales linearly; the geometric descent requires additional structure.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Two left-handed Weyl fermions have charges −1 and 2 under the same normalized U(1). Compute their total cubic and linear charge sums and write I₆ including the mixed gravitational term. In flat gravity, evaluate the consistent variation when .
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Add the polynomials before descending; charges enter cubically in the pure gauge term and linearly in the mixed gravitational term.
Compare with the solution
The sums are and . Hence . In flat gravity the variation is . Neither anomaly cancels. The linear sum remains relevant when gravitational backgrounds are admitted even though it does not contribute to this particular flat-background variation.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Four-dimensional perturbative anomalies are organized by a six-form polynomial and a local descent.
- The phase normalization and charge convention fix numerical factors.
- Consistent and covariant currents differ, while global anomalies require information beyond the polynomial.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.