Preserve the vector current and expose the axial anomaly
Relate the triangle Ward identities to spectral flow with explicit current, charge, and unit conventions.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Distinguish an axial global-current anomaly from a gauge inconsistency.
- Explain why triangle momentum routing cannot preserve every classical Ward identity.
- Compute integrated axial production with declared normalization and boundary flux.
A massless Dirac field has classical vector and axial phase symmetries, but a quantum regulator cannot preserve both in an arbitrary electromagnetic background. Choosing exact vector gauge invariance leaves an axial Ward identity with a local extra term. The result is physical charge transfer between chiral sectors, not loss of electromagnetic charge. Following the current definitions and the regulator choice is essential: formulas for a single chiral gauge current use different coefficients from the axial current of a vectorlike Dirac fermion.
Name the conserved charge before computing a loop
Work in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime with and . The dimensionless coupling q is the fermion's electromagnetic charge in this normalization. The vector number current is , and the electromagnetic current is . Define axial charge as right-handed number minus left-handed number. Choose the chirality and field orientation convention in which parallel positive electric and magnetic fields produce positive axial charge. This fixes the sign used below.
For zero fermion mass, both currents are conserved by the classical equations. A nonzero mass already breaks axial symmetry explicitly, adding a pseudoscalar mass term to its divergence. That explicit breaking must be separated from the quantum anomaly. If electromagnetism is dynamical, its gauge Ward identity must remain exact so that redundant photon polarizations decouple consistently. An anomalous axial global current is compatible with that requirement; an uncanceled anomaly in the gauged vector current would not be.
Understand what the triangle ambiguity means
The relevant three-point function contains one axial-current vertex and two vector-current vertices. Its superficially linearly divergent loop integral cannot be shifted as though it were absolutely convergent. Different routings, or equivalent local subtraction choices, redistribute local terms among the three Ward identities. Enforcing the two vector identities fixes this freedom and leaves the axial divergence. The anomaly is therefore not removed by a clever integration variable change; the proposed change must respect the regulator and the required gauge identities.
With the stated vector-preserving prescription, a single Dirac fermion contributes to axial-number production. The square arises from the two vector couplings, while the axial current has no extra electromagnetic charge factor. A complementary derivation counts the lowest Landau-level degeneracy per transverse area and one-dimensional spectral flow along the field. Higher levels pair opposite contributions. The anomaly coefficient has a protected meaning in this relativistic theory, but does not by itself determine a material's steady transport current or relaxation rate.
Keep locality, boundaries, and observables separate
Integrating a local divergence includes flux through the spatial boundary. A measured change in axial population can therefore differ from the spacetime integral of the anomaly source when axial charge escapes, when a mass term matters, or when interactions relax the population. Parallel fields give a nonzero source, perpendicular fields give zero dot product, and reversing one field reverses the source. Reversing the sign of q alone does not reverse axial-number production because its coefficient contains the square.
One can formally subtract a gauge-potential-dependent Chern–Simons current to write a conserved-looking axial expression. The price is loss of gauge invariance, so this does not restore a gauge-invariant conserved axial charge. Similarly, assigning all triangle vertices an identical anomalous Ward identity changes the current prescription rather than contradicting the vector-preserving result. Every comparison should identify whether it concerns vector, axial, consistent chiral, or covariant chiral current before comparing numerical coefficients.
Work it through
An integrated source with no boundary loss
A massless Dirac field has . Over a specified spacetime region, in natural units. The integrated axial flux through its spatial boundary is zero. Find the axial-number change and explain what happens to vector charge.
The axial coefficient contains , because both electromagnetic vertices couple to the same charge. There is no further factor q: the requested quantity is axial number, not a charge-weighted axial current.
Integrating the vector-preserving Ward identity gives . The stipulated vanishing boundary flux removes the surface contribution; it is an input rather than a consequence of the anomaly.
The vector number current remains conserved, so the effect transfers net occupation between the two chiral sectors without creating net electromagnetic charge. Reversing the sign of the background dot product would give an axial-number change of −12 under the same orientation convention.
Axial number increases by 12, while vector charge remains conserved. The result is dimensionless and applies to the stated massless theory and integrated boundary condition.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · vectors
Test the dot-product selection rule
Take a fixed reference electric direction along +x. Reset and set both controls to angle 0° and magnitude 2; predict x component 2, representing a normalized field dot product. Reset and set both controls to angle 90° and magnitude 2; predict x component 0. The vector model tests geometry only; it has no fermions, Landau levels, anomaly coefficient, or axial-charge evolution.
- x component
- 1.393
- y component
- 0.975
- Magnitude
- 1.7
Playback traces a fixed vector and its projections. Angle and magnitude set the geometry; the moving marker does not change them. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThe source depends on the signed field dot product; the vector illustration does not calculate its quantum coefficient.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For a separate massless Dirac theory in dimensions, use the vector-preserving convention . Let , zero integrated axial boundary flux, and . Find the axial-number change. If the electric field reverses, how does the result change, and why should the four-dimensional coefficient not be substituted?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Integrate the stated two-dimensional identity. Its state counting and dimensions differ from the four-dimensional Landau-level problem.
Compare with the solution
The change is , and reversing E gives −4. Vector charge is still conserved by the chosen regulator. In two dimensions the spectral-flow coefficient contains q and one electric field; in four dimensions the additional transverse Landau degeneracy supplies another charge-field factor. Using the four-dimensional expression here would introduce a magnetic field and the wrong dimensional density of states.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Specify which current is conserved by the regulator.
- The Dirac axial source and a single-Weyl gauge anomaly have different normalizations.
- Integrated axial production includes mass effects and boundary flux when present.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.