Atomic line formation and the curve of growth
Separate line opacity, broadening and equivalent width, then identify the linear, saturated-core and damping-wing growth regimes.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Normalize a line profile and distinguish integrated from line-centre opacity.
- Compute a weak-line equivalent width and frequency-to-wavelength conversion.
- Explain how saturation and different broadening mechanisms alter column inference.
A spectral line records atomic populations and a distribution of photon frequencies. Its depth is not a direct column-density meter once the centre becomes opaque, and its width can reflect several processes besides temperature. The curve of growth tracks the total absorbed area as column increases under specified profile and geometry assumptions. We begin with a fully covering cold foreground screen and a smooth background continuum, deliberately excluding foreground line emission so that equivalent width can be tied cleanly to opacity.
An integrated cross section and a profile play different roles
Let N l be the column density in the absorbing lower level, with units per square metre. Define an integrated effective line cross section in square-metre hertz units and a profile whose frequency integral is one. Then . The effective cross section here assumes the net stimulated-emission correction is already specified or negligible; a lower-level column alone is not enough when the upper population changes that correction. The normalized profile has inverse-hertz units.
For the pure absorbing screen, the residual continuum-normalized intensity is the exponential of minus line optical depth. Its equivalent width is the frequency integral of the missing fraction and has hertz units. In a sufficiently narrow line, wavelength equivalent width equals frequency equivalent width times the squared central wavelength divided by c. The absolute Jacobian is required because frequency decreases when wavelength increases. Neither equivalent width is a line-centre depth, and an observed unresolved width also involves the instrumental response.
Broadening mechanisms change the profile differently
Thermal velocities produce a Gaussian core. Write its Doppler width as , where b is the Gaussian Doppler velocity parameter rather than its one-dimensional rms value. For independent thermal and Gaussian microscopic turbulent velocities, . The turbulent parameter uses the same Doppler convention. Different ion masses help separate thermal from shared velocity broadening, but unresolved bulk components can complicate that interpretation. A single wide line does not uniquely determine its gas temperature.
Finite upper-state lifetimes produce Lorentzian natural wings; collisions can add pressure broadening under an appropriate impact approximation. Convolving Gaussian velocities with a Lorentz profile gives a Voigt profile, while macroscopic velocity structure can instead produce displaced components. These are line-shape mechanisms around a transition frequency, not the broad continuum spectral slopes produced by free-free or synchrotron radiation. Natural and collisional widths also need not be negligible merely because an observed core appears approximately Gaussian at the available spectral resolution.
Saturation makes column inference profile dependent
In the weak regime, expanding the attenuation exponential gives equivalent width proportional to lower-level column, independent of how a normalized profile distributes its small opacity. Once the core is black, adding column mostly widens the opaque frequency interval, producing slow square-root-of-logarithm growth for a Gaussian. At still larger columns, Lorentz wings can dominate and give equivalent width proportional to square root of column at fixed atomic and broadening parameters. These regimes explain why a deep line can be much less informative about column than a shallow unsaturated transition.
Several transitions with different strengths can reveal hidden saturation because their equivalent-width ratios cease to follow their weak-line strengths. Partial covering, line emission filling the trough, uncertain continua, velocity blends, and instrumental convolution must still be modeled. Integrated equivalent width is conserved by a normalized instrumental convolution of a well-defined isolated profile, but a finite integration window or blends can spoil a practical measurement. The curve of growth is therefore a conditional inference tool: state the background geometry, atomic population assumptions, and profile family before extracting an abundance.
Work it through
A weak optical absorption line
Use a fully covering pure screen with , , Doppler width , and central wavelength 500 nm. Check the weak-line approximation and find both equivalent widths using c = 3 × 10^8 m/s.
The integrated optical-depth area is . The line-centre depth is this area divided by square root pi times , approximately 0.0113.
Because the centre is much thinner than one, the weak-line expansion is justified. It gives without requiring a saturated-core correction.
Convert 500 nm to . Then , or .
The centre is optically thin, Wnu is about 2 × 10^8 Hz, and Wlambda is about 1.67 × 10^−4 nm.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
A square-root growth law can be inspected inversely
Reset and set BOTH Coefficient a = 1 and Position x = 1; predict y = 1. For a fresh comparison, Reset and set a = 1 and x = 2; predict y = 4. Interpret x schematically as a width scale and y as its square.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThe quadratic illustrates why a square-root width can grow slowly relative to its squared argument. It does not generate a line profile, absorption spectrum, curve of growth, or radiation-hydrodynamics solution.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For a Gaussian saturated-core approximation with negligible Lorentz wings, take . Compare equivalent widths when the central optical depths are and . At fixed profile, by what factor has the column increased?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Use the square root of the natural logarithm in the stated asymptote; column scales with central depth when the profile is fixed.
Compare with the solution
The first width is . The second is . Thus the width increases by only three halves while the column increases by , about 148. These are leading Gaussian-core estimates; a real transition with appreciable damping wings at such depths would require the Voigt curve instead of this deliberately wing-free comparison.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Integrated line strength, line-centre opacity, and equivalent width are different quantities.
- Thermal, turbulent, natural, collisional, and instrumental broadening require separate assumptions.
- Saturation and damping wings change the relation between absorbed area and column density.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.