Stark shifts and atomic polarizability
Derive quadratic shifts for isolated parity states and identify the degenerate regime that permits linear Stark splitting.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Use parity to determine whether a diagonal first-order Stark shift vanishes.
- Relate the second-order energy denominator to polarizability and induced dipole.
- Distinguish perturbative quadratic shifts from degenerate linear splitting.
An electric field changes an atom by mixing opposite-parity states. A stationary atom can therefore have no permanent electric dipole while still responding strongly to an applied field. The leading response depends on energy denominators: a well-isolated parity eigenstate usually shifts quadratically, whereas a degenerate opposite-parity pair can split linearly. These statements concern different perturbative regimes and are compatible. Measuring a transition also requires the difference of the two states’ responses, rather than one state’s polarizability alone.
Parity controls the first-order term
Write the perturbation as , where is a uniform static electric field and is the atomic dipole operator along it. For one electron relative to a positive nucleus, , so the perturbation is . Under parity, position and dipole change sign. A nondegenerate parity eigenstate therefore has zero diagonal dipole expectation, making its first-order energy shift vanish in the absence of parity-violating effects.
Off-diagonal dipole elements between opposite-parity states need not vanish. They change the wavefunction at first order even when the energy does not move until second order. The induced expectation of the dipole consequently grows linearly with a weak field. This separates a response property from a permanent moment. It also explains why a photograph of an unperturbed symmetric electron density cannot establish that its polarizability is zero: response involves accessible excited states and their energy gaps.
The denominator sets sign and validity
For a nondegenerate ground state every excited-state denominator is negative, so its static scalar polarizability is positive and its leading shift is downward. An excited state has states both above and below it; contributions can oppose each other, and its polarizability need not be positive. The scalar notation assumes a specified substate response or an isotropic level. For angular momentum at least one, tensor contributions can make shifts depend on the magnetic projection and field geometry.
Differentiating the energy with respect to field gives the induced dipole: in the quadratic regime. The factor one half in the energy accounts for building up an induced dipole. Using the permanent-dipole expression with the final induced dipole would double the shift. The second-order expansion requires each relevant mixing energy to be small compared with its energy gap; a small field in laboratory units alone is not a sufficient criterion.
Degeneracy changes the leading power
Consider two opposite-parity states with equal unperturbed energy and real off-diagonal dipole magnitude d. Diagonalizing their two-dimensional perturbation gives shifts for a signed field, with branches exchanging under field reversal. The new eigenvectors are equal mixtures, so the original parity states are no longer field eigenstates. If the pair instead has a nonzero gap, sufficiently weak fields recover quadratic shifts. Hydrogen’s ideal Coulomb n manifolds supply a famous linear-Stark approximation, but fine, Lamb, and hyperfine splittings set its weak-field limits.
A static electric field also turns strict Coulomb bound states into metastable resonances because the potential permits escape far along one direction. Perturbative real shifts describe long-lived states when ionization is negligible on the measurement timescale. They cannot predict arbitrary strong-field stability. In a measured transition, the relevant coefficient is the upper-minus-lower polarizability; common shifts cancel. The parabola lab displays this quadratic dependence algebraically and does not mix orbitals, compute a polarizability, or model escape.
Work it through
A differential polarizability measurement
A transition has . Find its shift at and the field needed for four times the shift magnitude.
The quoted coefficient already divides the polarizability difference by h. Retain the factor one half from induced-dipole energy: the frequency coefficient is .
Squaring the field gives . Multiplication gives , so the transition moves downward.
Four times the shift magnitude requires twice the field in the same quadratic regime. At the predicted shift is ; verify that weak mixing and negligible ionization remain valid.
The shift is −200 Hz; doubling the field yields −800 Hz within the stated static quadratic regime.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
Inspect an induced-dipole parabola
Reset and set coefficient and position ; predict . Repeat from Reset with both controls , ; predict . Treat x as normalized field and y as normalized shift. The parabola demonstrates a factor of four, not atomic polarizability or strong-field ionization.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forQuadratic energy and linear slope express different parts of the same weak-field response.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
A two-state atom has a ground-to-excited gap and dipole coupling . Estimate the ground-state shift and decide whether nondegenerate perturbation theory is plausible.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
The leading ground-state shift is minus coupling squared divided by the gap; compare the coupling-to-gap ratio.
Compare with the solution
In ordinary-frequency units, . The mixing ratio is 0.01, which supports the weak-coupling expansion for this isolated pair. The omitted terms start at fourth order in the coupling, while additional atomic states could alter the total polarizability.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Parity can forbid a first-order shift while allowing first-order mixing of the state.
- Induced-dipole energy contains a factor one half and depends quadratically on weak static field.
- Near degeneracy demands diagonalization; a real atomic strong-field problem also includes ionization.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.