Estimate radiation from a weak encounter
Integrate Larmor power along an approximately straight Coulomb encounter while testing deflection, recoil, and energy-loss assumptions.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Derive impact-parameter scaling for classical weak-deflection radiation.
- Distinguish an approximate orbit from an exact radiation integral on that orbit.
- Identify when close encounters require curved trajectories or quantum treatment.
Bremsstrahlung is radiation produced when an encounter changes a charge's velocity. Despite its name, braking is not the only mechanism: a change of direction also accelerates the charge. A controlled classical estimate treats a light projectile passing a much heavier fixed target with only a small deflection. We will integrate radiated power along the undeflected path, then inspect the assumptions that prevent this approximation from predicting unlimited radiation in arbitrarily close encounters.
A straight line can approximate a bent trajectory
Let a projectile of charge q and mass m pass a heavy target charge Q at speed v and impact parameter b. The target is fixed and recoil is neglected. On the unperturbed straight path the separation squared is b squared plus v squared times time squared, with closest approach at time zero. Define alpha as the magnitude of the Coulomb product divided by four pi epsilon zero. The acceleration magnitude on that trial path is alpha divided by mass and separation squared.
It may sound inconsistent to assign acceleration to a straight path. This is a first-order orbit approximation: evaluate the force on the leading undeflected trajectory and use it to calculate small corrections. The actual projectile bends slightly. Integrating its transverse acceleration gives a velocity change proportional to the inverse of b times v. Require that change to be much smaller than the incoming speed. This condition, rather than the visual straightness of a sketch, controls whether the approximation is useful.
Integrate energy rather than a peak power guess
Larmor power on the trial path is proportional to acceleration squared. Its time integral can be performed by substituting v times time divided by impact parameter. The dimensionless integral of one over one plus the squared variable, all squared, equals pi over two. This produces an exact coefficient for this approximate trajectory. A rough estimate using peak power times encounter duration captures the same impact-parameter scaling but misses that numerical factor.
The result decreases as impact parameter cubed and incoming speed to the first power. The strong dependence on impact parameter reflects both stronger forces and shorter encounter duration at small distance. These scalings hold with target charge, projectile properties, and the approximation fixed. They are not a complete material stopping-power formula: a material calculation must integrate over a physically justified distribution of encounters, account for screening and recoil, and determine suitable short-distance limits.
Close approaches expose missing physics
As b shrinks, the trial-path energy diverges while the projectile initially carries finite kinetic energy. This is a failure of extrapolation, not a source of infinite physical energy. The small-deflection condition fails first or another neglected scale becomes important. Independently require radiated energy to be small compared with kinetic energy if an energy-loss-free orbit is used. A better trajectory alone does not justify neglecting radiation reaction when the energy loss becomes substantial.
Classical localization also needs an impact parameter large compared with the projectile's reduced de Broglie wavelength. Characteristic encounter frequencies are of order v divided by b; their photon energies must be small compared with kinetic energy for a classical soft-emission picture. Screening changes distant encounters, and target recoil matters when the target is not sufficiently heavy. The quadratic lab isolates the acceleration-square rule; it cannot compute a Coulomb trajectory, its impulse, or a bremsstrahlung spectrum.
Work it through
Scale a controlled collision
For one weak nonrelativistic encounter the calculated radiated energy is 8 pJ and the deflection estimate |Δvperp|/v is 0.02. Keep speed and charges fixed but double impact parameter. Find the new radiated energy, deflection estimate, and encounter duration ratio.
Radiated energy is proportional to b⁻³ on the trial path. Doubling b divides 8 pJ by eight, giving 1 pJ.
The deflection parameter is proportional to b⁻¹ at fixed speed. It falls from 0.02 to 0.01, improving the straight-line approximation.
The duration estimate b/v doubles. The peak acceleration falls by four and peak power by sixteen; doubling duration therefore predicts the same factor-of-eight energy reduction as the full integral.
The new energy is 1 pJ, the estimated deflection ratio is 0.01, and encounter duration doubles. Other classical and small-energy-loss assumptions must still hold.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
Square an acceleration amplitude
For fresh runs Reset and set BOTH coefficient a=1, position x=1; then Reset and set coefficient a=1, position x=0.5. Interpret x as acceleration divided by a reference acceleration. Predict normalized power readouts 1 and 0.25. This quadratic model supplies no collision time history or impact-parameter integration.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA halved acceleration gives quarter power; encounter energy also depends on the duration and shape of acceleration.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
At fixed impact parameter and charges, double the incoming nonrelativistic speed while remaining within all validity limits. How do the trial-path radiated energy, deflection ratio, and duration scale?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Use the separate factors v⁻¹ in energy, v⁻² in deflection, and v⁻¹ in encounter time.
Compare with the solution
Radiated energy halves, the deflection ratio becomes one quarter, and encounter duration halves. Peak Coulomb acceleration at the same impact parameter is unchanged, so reduced duration explains the energy reduction. The particle kinetic energy increases fourfold, making the radiated fraction smaller by a factor of eight. Relativistic speeds would require revisiting Larmor power and the trajectory model.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Straight-line bremsstrahlung uses forces evaluated on a leading unperturbed path.
- The time-integrated weak-encounter energy scales as 1/(vb³).
- Deflection, quantum localization, recoil, and radiated fraction are independent validity checks.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.