Operator product expansion and convergence
Use a separating sphere to understand when a conformal operator expansion converges.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Organize an OPE by complete conformal families.
- Check a sufficient Euclidean convergence domain.
- Distinguish a convergent expansion from a finite truncation with a proven error.
The operator product expansion replaces two nearby insertions by a sum of local operators inside a larger correlator. In a suitable Euclidean CFT it is more than a formal short-distance asymptotic slogan: radial quantization gives a convergence argument when a sphere separates the fused insertions from the others. The argument assumes a well-defined complete radial Hilbert space. It does not license the same sum at coincident singularities or arbitrary Lorentzian kinematics without attention to analytic continuation.
Match dimensions and group the descendants
For two scalar primaries, an exchanged scalar contributes a distance power determined by its dimension minus the two external dimensions. Derivatives of that exchanged primary supply further powers and angular dependence. Their relative coefficients follow from conformal symmetry once the primary coefficient is given. Spinning exchanges require tensor structures as well. Keeping only primary terms generally fails to reproduce the full correlator, because each primary represents an entire family of descendants.
In a normalized identical-scalar OPE the identity coefficient is fixed by the two-point function. Other primary coefficients are related to normalized three-point data. Signs of individual real OPE coefficients can depend on operator sign conventions; positivity becomes a statement about suitable squared coefficients in reflection-positive identical-operator four-point functions. An OPE coefficient is not a classical probability of a microscopic particle reaction, even when its square enters a positive spectral expansion.
Locate the separating sphere
Center radial quantization at one of the two fused insertions. If their separation is smaller than the distance from that center to every remaining insertion, a sphere can enclose the pair while leaving all others outside. The inside path integral prepares a state, and expanding it in a complete dilatation eigenbasis is precisely the OPE. The outside path integral supplies a bra. Hilbert-space convergence then controls the overlap with that external configuration.
This radius test is sufficient, not a universal maximal domain. A different conformal frame can sometimes supply a better separating sphere. Approaching the boundary of a chosen expansion can make convergence slow, and a collision with another operator creates a physical singularity. Interchanging limits, derivatives and infinite sums requires appropriate control. The theorem concerns full sums under its assumptions, whereas a practical finite list of primaries or descendant levels introduces a separate approximation.
Estimate errors only when the coefficient growth is controlled
Radial propagation suppresses large scaling dimensions by exponential factors at fixed separated geometry. Degeneracy and coefficient growth also contribute, so a bare geometric power cannot automatically be called the full remainder. Rigorous convergence results combine positivity and spectral estimates to control tails under stated conditions. Near the edge of a channel's domain, reorganizing into another channel or a better radial coordinate can be more effective than simply adding a few arbitrary low operators.
A geometric series is a useful transparent analogy because its tail is exactly known. It demonstrates how a convergent sum can still be poorly approximated near its boundary, but its coefficient assumptions must not be transferred silently to a CFT. The spectral lab similarly illustrates changing the number of retained terms in a fixed sine sum. It has no primary dimensions, OPE coefficients, separating spheres or analytic-continuation prescription and does not certify a bootstrap truncation.
Work it through
Check the sphere and a declared toy remainder
Two insertions are at 0 and distance 1, while the closest remaining insertion is distance 3 from 0. Check the centered-sphere criterion. For the separate toy series with , retain levels zero through three and find the exact omitted tail.
The fused separation is one and the closest external radius is three. Any sphere of radius strictly between them separates the pair from the other insertions, so the sufficient Euclidean OPE criterion holds.
For the declared unit-coefficient toy series the first omitted term is . Keeping levels zero through three means four terms were retained, not three.
The tail is . This numerical remainder belongs to the specified geometric model; it is not a guaranteed error for a CFT with unknown dimensions and coefficients.
A separating sphere exists, and the independent geometric-series tail is exactly 1/54.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · spectral
Retained terms versus convergence evidence
Reset and set BOTH Mode count N = 3 and Coefficient decay p = 2. Predict a smoother-looking finite sum than a fresh comparison after Reset with N = 10 and p = 0 at the same time. Both controls change the declared sine series; neither controls a CFT OPE, supplies tail bounds or tests a convergence theorem.
- Sum at x = π/2
- 0.867
- Smallest wavelength
- 2π / 5
- Highest-mode coefficient
- 0.2
A finite sum of sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Playback changes t; increasing the cutoff includes finer spatial scales. This is not a proof about a continuum limit or renormalization. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA finite sum requires an independently justified relationship to the intended infinite expansion.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For a unit-coefficient geometric toy series at , what smallest highest retained level N makes the exact tail strictly below 0.01? Count the retained levels starting at zero. Is that N automatically sufficient for a conformal OPE?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
The tail simplifies to 2 to the power −N. Test adjacent integers and keep the strict inequality.
Compare with the solution
The tail is . At N = 6 it is , while at N = 7 it is . Thus retain levels zero through seven, eight terms in total. This does not establish a CFT cutoff: actual operator degeneracies, dimensions and coefficients must enter its own remainder estimate, and the relevant channel geometry must remain in a controlled domain.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- A conformal OPE sums full primary families.
- A separating sphere gives a useful sufficient Euclidean domain.
- Convergence and a quantitative finite-cutoff error are distinct claims.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.