research28 min studyLesson 863 in Physics

Conserve curvature only when its hypotheses hold

Separate uniform-density geometry, entropy pressure, gradient terms, and clock degeneracies.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Construct the curvature perturbation on uniform-density slices.
  • Identify the nonadiabatic pressure source in its large-scale evolution.
  • State the regularity and scale assumptions behind superhorizon conservation.

A useful primordial variable should retain information while a mode is much larger than the expansion scale. The curvature perturbation on uniform-density slices often does so, allowing an early calculation to be connected to later radiation and matter evolution. Its conservation is conditional. Entropy pressure, non-negligible gradients, or a singular choice of time label can spoil an argument that simply says outside the horizon means frozen. The geometric definition and the evolution equation should therefore be checked together rather than inferred from a plot of one gauge-dependent potential.

Define the geometry of a density slice

Use ζ=−ψ−ℋδρ/ρ′ with the preceding metric signs. A passive time shift to uniform density removes δρ while changing ψ; its negative is precisely ζ. At first order the spatial metric on that slice has the scalar conformal factor one plus twice ζ after a suitable spatial threading choice. Equivalently, its long-wavelength local scale factor is a times expζ. Positive ζ in this convention means a locally enlarged spatial scale, not a positive Newtonian lapse by definition.

The background continuity equation gives ρ′=−3ℋ(ρ+p) for a conserved total stress tensor. Thus a barotropic fluid with constant w has ζ=−ψ+δ/[3(1+w)], where δ is its density contrast in the original slicing. This rewrite assumes the background evolves and ρ+p is nonzero. A pure cosmological constant has no usable uniform-density clock of this kind, so dividing by its vanishing density derivative cannot define an independent propagating scalar mode.

ζ=−ψ−Hδρρˉ′,ρˉ′=−3H(ρˉ+pˉ),ζ=−ψ+δ3(1+w)(w constant)\zeta=-\psi-\mathcal H\frac{\delta\rho}{\bar\rho'},\qquad \bar\rho'=-3\mathcal H(\bar\rho+\bar p),\qquad \zeta=-\psi+\frac{\delta}{3(1+w)}\quad(w\ \text{constant})
ζ and δ are dimensionless. The definition is gauge invariant to first order when ρ′≠0. The constant-w form also assumes the stated conserved background and p=wρ.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Derive the source from energy conservation

Define the adiabatic derivative ca²=p′/ρ′ and split the pressure perturbation into ca²δρ plus a remainder δpnad. This remainder is gauge invariant because the background time-shift pieces cancel. It measures failure of the perturbed pressure to follow the background pressure-density relation; ca² is not automatically the physical propagation speed of every field or mixture. Multiple components can create such a remainder even if each component separately has a simple equation of state.

Rewriting the perturbed energy-conservation equation yields ζ′=−ℋδpnad/(ρ+p) plus spatial-gradient terms. On scales k/ℋ much smaller than one, those terms can be neglected only for regular perturbations whose velocity/shear variables do not compensate the small gradients. With negligible nonadiabatic pressure and that regular large-scale limit, ζ is approximately constant. This energy-conservation argument is broader than one specific gravitational field equation, but still presupposes a meaningful background-plus-perturbation expansion.

δpnad=δp−ca2δρ,ca2=pˉ′ρˉ′,ζ′=−Hρˉ+pˉδpnad+spatial-gradient terms\delta p_{\rm nad}=\delta p-c_a^2\delta\rho,\qquad c_a^2=\frac{\bar p'}{\bar\rho'},\qquad \zeta'=-\frac{\mathcal H}{\bar\rho+\bar p}\delta p_{\rm nad}+\text{spatial-gradient terms}
Every source term has inverse-conformal-time units. Suppressing gradients requires the regular super-Hubble regime and appropriate shear behavior; setting k small alone is not a general conservation proof.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Distinguish a Hubble scale from a causal theorem

The phrase superhorizon is commonly used here for k≪aH, although the Hubble radius is not identical to every particle or event horizon. A comoving curvature variable can coincide with ζ at leading large-scale order for regular adiabatic solutions under the relevant constraints; its sign depends on how that variable was defined. A non-attractor scalar background can make a comoving-curvature mode evolve, so one must not replace the stated conservation hypotheses with the phrase single field alone.

The heat lab illustrates the importance of a rate hierarchy rather than primordial dynamics. Reset and set mode n=1 and diffusivity κ=0.1, then Step twice to time 1; predict amplitude exp(−0.1). Reset and set n=1,κ=1, then Step twice; predict exp(−1). A slowly varying mode can look nearly constant over a short interval without an exact conservation law. This analytic periodic diffusion model has no expansion, density slicing, entropy pressure, or inflationary curvature equation.

N=log⁡a,dζdN≃−δpnadρˉ+pˉwhen spatial gradients are negligibleN=\log a,\qquad \frac{d\zeta}{dN}\simeq-\frac{\delta p_{\rm nad}}{\bar\rho+\bar p}\qquad\text{when spatial gradients are negligible}
N counts background e-folds. This dimensionless source relation is useful for a stipulated large-scale history; a constant source is an illustrative assumption rather than a universal fluid solution.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Check radiation curvature across a slicing change

For radiation, use ψ=0.002 and δρ/ρ=0.012 at one time. Compute ζ. Then shift the time label by ℋT=0.004 and verify ζ using the new density and curvature coefficients.

  1. Radiation has w=1/3, so ζ=−ψ+δ/4=−0.002+0.003=0.001. The factor four comes from the radiation background dilution law.

  2. The transformed curvature is ψtilde=0.006. Because ρ′/ρ=−4ℋ, the transformed density contrast is δtilde=0.012+4×0.004=0.028.

  3. The recombined value is −0.006+0.028/4=0.001. This verifies gauge invariance at one time; conservation between different times would additionally require the pressure and gradient conditions.

The result

The same event has ζ=0.001 in both slicings, despite different density contrasts.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · heat

Distinguish slow change from conservation

Reset and set n=1,κ=0.1, then Step twice to t=1; predict amplitude exp(−0.1). Reset and set n=1,κ=1, then Step twice; predict exp(−1).

Distinguish slow change from conservationThe exact periodic heat-equation mode is u(x,t) = exp(−κn²t) sin(nx), on [0,2π]. Playback advances physical time. The initial sine is shown separately, and the unnormalized L² norm is √π exp(−κn²t). This analytic instrument does not run a finite-difference solver or test discretization stability. Current readings: Current amplitude: 1; Spatial L² norm: 1.772; Decay rate · κn²: 3.6 /s. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.Periodic heat equation mode 3 at time 0: the amplitude is 1.0π/2π3π/22π−1−0.500.51x · periodic intervalTemperature perturbation uExact mode · n = 3
Current temperature modeInitial sineCurrent amplitude
Current amplitude
1
Spatial L² norm
1.772
Decay rate · κn²
3.6 /s
t = 0 s

The exact periodic heat-equation mode is u(x,t) = exp(−κn²t) sin(nx), on [0,2π]. Playback advances physical time. The initial sine is shown separately, and the unnormalized L² norm is √π exp(−κn²t). This analytic instrument does not run a finite-difference solver or test discretization stability. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThis exact periodic heat mode is a rate comparison only. It contains no curvature perturbation, inflationary expansion, or entropy source.

Check your understanding

Which conditions support large-scale conservation of ζ?

Try it yourself

Neglect gradients and suppose δpnad/(ρ+p)=0.002 stays constant for three background e-folds. Starting from ζ=0.010, find the final ζ and state why being outside the Hubble scale did not freeze it.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Integrate dζ/dN=−0.002 rather than setting its source to zero.

Compare with the solution

The change is −0.002×3=−0.006, so the final value is 0.004. The nonadiabatic pressure remains a source even after gradient terms have been neglected. This calculation assumes the supplied small constant source is dynamically realizable over the interval; it is not a claim that every entropy mode is constant or that a particular inflationary model produces it.

Take it with you

  • Uniform-density curvature has a declared spatial sign and requires a usable density clock.
  • Large-scale conservation follows after checking entropy and gradient/shear sources.
  • Gauge invariance at one event and conservation through time are different statements.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.