Null geodesics and gravitational lensing
Relate the weak-deflection limit to lens geometry while distinguishing strong-field capture from a thin-lens approximation.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Define a null impact parameter independently of affine normalization.
- Check the assumptions behind weak-deflection and thin-lens formulas.
- Locate the photon orbit and critical capture impact parameter.
Light bending compares a trajectory with observations made by specified source and receiver families. In a Schwarzschild exterior, spherical symmetry again reduces the orbit to a plane, while a null trajectory has no proper-time parameter. Rescaling an arbitrarily normalized null tangent rescales its two conserved constants together; a measured photon energy fixes the physical momentum normalization. Their ratio remains unchanged. This lesson separates weak deflection, a geometric lens approximation, and the strong-field capture threshold. They arise from the same metric but cannot be substituted for one another outside their respective regimes.
Null constants give an orbit equation
Let E and L be the conserved photon energy and angular momentum defined using the asymptotic time and rotational symmetries. The impact parameter b is L times c divided by E, with length units and a sign that can encode orientation; use its positive magnitude when discussing capture. With inverse radius u and orbital angle phi, eliminating the affine parameter gives the nonlinear orbit equation below. Its curvature correction is proportional to mass length and vanishes in the flat limit.
For an incoming ray whose closest approach is far from the mass scale, treat that correction perturbatively around the straight-line orbit. The leading net deflection between asymptotically distant directions is four m divided by b. This approximation requires b much greater than m and endpoints far enough away for the asymptotic interpretation. A Newtonian particle-like light estimate using only temporal attraction gives half the result; spatial metric curvature contributes at the same order and cannot be omitted consistently.
A lens equation adds geometry and assumptions
A thin-lens model approximates the bend as occurring in one plane and uses small angular separations. For an isolated spherical point lens, beta is the unlensed angular source position and theta is an image position relative to the lens. Angular-diameter distances connect observer, lens, and source. In the elementary nearly Euclidean setup they reduce to the corresponding ordinary distances, while cosmological applications require the actual distance-redshift model. The lens equation then balances straight propagation and the weak deflection at the lens plane.
At exact alignment the point-lens equation predicts an Einstein ring with angular radius theta E. Its square is proportional to lens mass at fixed distances, so quadrupling the mass doubles the ring angle. A ring is therefore not a direct angular measurement of the event horizon. Finite source size, extended lens structure, multiple lens planes, wave effects, and strong deflection can all invalidate parts of this reduction. A measured angle constrains a combination of mass and geometry rather than independently revealing every distance.
The photon orbit controls a different threshold
For null radial motion, the angular effective potential is proportional to f divided by radius squared. Its maximum occurs at three m. That circular null orbit is unstable: a small radial departure can lead toward escape or inward capture rather than bounded oscillation. Evaluating the ratio of radius squared to f there gives the critical impact parameter three square root of three times m. This impact parameter is larger than the photon orbit’s areal radius because it is defined by asymptotic conserved quantities.
For a ray arriving from infinity at an ideal Schwarzschild black hole, an impact parameter below the critical value yields capture and one above yields scattering, with the threshold ray asymptotically approaching the unstable orbit. A material surface can intercept rays and alter the observable fate; the exterior trajectory alone does not establish a black-hole completion. Near the threshold, winding paths and large deflections replace the simple weak-lens formula. A planar quadratic instrument tests the square-root mass scaling only and traces no null geodesic.
Work it through
A controlled small deflection
Take mass length and impact parameter , with asymptotically distant source and receiver. Find the leading deflection in radians and arcseconds, using one radian equal to 206265 arcseconds.
Convert the mass length to 2000 m and check . The trajectory is far into the weak-deflection regime rather than near the photon orbit.
Apply the leading formula: radians. The positive value quoted is the bending magnitude toward the lens.
Multiply by the supplied angular conversion to obtain about 2.06265 arcseconds. Higher-order mass-to-impact corrections and finite-endpoint corrections have been excluded by the model assumptions.
The leading asymptotic bend is 10⁻⁵ radians, about 2.063 arcseconds; its smallness and large b/m support the weak-deflection approximation.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
Test the squared angular scaling of a point lens
Reset and set coefficient , position ; predict height 0.25. Repeat from Reset with both controls , ; predict height one. Interpret x as a normalized Einstein-ring angle and height as normalized lens mass only for the fixed-distance relation . The lab’s parabola computes that algebraic scaling; it has no distance controls, ray tracer, or curved metric.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA fourfold mass at fixed distances gives twice the ring angle, rather than four times the angle.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For the same ideal Schwarzschild black hole, find the photon-orbit radius and critical impact parameter. Classify incoming rays from infinity with and .
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Compute the critical value from the null potential rather than applying the small-angle deflection formula.
Compare with the solution
The photon orbit is at and the threshold is . The 10 km ray lies below the threshold and is captured; the 11 km ray lies above it and scatters back out. At the exact critical value the ideal trajectory approaches the unstable circular orbit asymptotically. These near-threshold rays are not described reliably by the leading weak-lensing angle.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Null impact parameter is a conserved ratio with length units, independent of affine scaling.
- Weak deflection and the thin-lens equation have separate geometric assumptions.
- The unstable photon orbit sets a strong-field threshold that a small-angle formula cannot reproduce.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.