Expand about a filled Fermi sea
Derive zero-temperature filling and controlled low-temperature corrections at fixed particle density.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Count occupied momentum states with internal degeneracy included.
- State smoothness and scale conditions for a Sommerfeld expansion.
- Distinguish fixed-density chemical-potential shifts from fixed-μ calculations.
Fermions cannot all fall into the lowest one-particle state. At zero temperature they fill available states up to a Fermi energy fixed by density and internal degeneracy. At low temperature only a narrow layer around that surface changes occupation substantially. The Sommerfeld expansion turns this picture into a systematic integral approximation. Its most important bookkeeping rule is to specify what is held fixed: a gas with conserved number generally adjusts chemical potential as temperature changes.
Fill a sphere in momentum space
For a uniform nonrelativistic ideal gas in three dimensions, each allowed momentum and internal state can hold at most one identical fermion. At zero temperature every state below chemical potential is filled and every state above it is empty. Counting a sphere of occupied wavevectors relates Fermi wavevector to number density. Its energy then follows from quadratic dispersion. The spin or internal degeneracy must be included once in the count; it does not multiply the energy of each occupied state.
Integrating energy over the filled sphere gives mean energy three fifths of Fermi energy per particle. Differentiating the ground-state energy with respect to volume at fixed number gives a nonzero pressure even at zero temperature. This degeneracy pressure is not caused by a thermal distribution of distinguishable particles and does not vanish merely because temperature does. The ideal formula assumes negligible interactions and nonrelativistic momenta, so applying it to strongly interacting matter or relativistic stars requires further physics.
Only the surface layer changes appreciably
The Fermi occupation smooths the step over an energy width of order thermal energy. Far below chemical potential, holes are exponentially rare; far above it, particles are exponentially rare. For an integral of a smooth function times the occupation, thermal changes from the two sides mostly cancel at first order in temperature. The leading surviving correction is proportional to temperature squared and the derivative of the smooth function at chemical potential.
This is an asymptotic expansion requiring chemical potential well above the lower spectral edge and the integrand smooth across the thermal window. Gaps, sharp density-of-states singularities, or temperatures comparable with Fermi temperature invalidate the simplest formula. The error notation refers to an appropriate smooth-integrand expansion, not a universal numerical bound for arbitrary spectra. One should inspect the energy dependence near the Fermi surface before treating the first correction as a controlled prediction.
Fix number before reporting the chemical potential
At fixed density, insert the square-root state density into the number integral and solve for the chemical potential shift that keeps number unchanged. Chemical potential falls slightly below its zero-temperature Fermi energy. Substituting that shift into the energy integral gives a quadratic increase in total energy and a heat capacity linear in temperature. Holding chemical potential at Fermi energy instead changes number and yields different intermediate coefficients; that is another ensemble path, not the fixed-density result.
The linear heat capacity reflects the small fraction of particles within the thermal surface layer, each changing energy by roughly thermal energy. The probability lab can illustrate exclusion-limited occupation fluctuations for equal-energy fermionic states at a prescribed occupation probability. It cannot display a Fermi surface or carry out the Sommerfeld integral. Its probability must be supplied from the Fermi function, and its finite equal-energy count must not be mistaken for the entire dispersive gas.
Work it through
Evaluate the first low-temperature corrections
An ideal Fermi gas has TF=1000 K and temperature 100 K at fixed density. Using π²≈9.87, estimate μ/EF and CV/(NkB). State why the two corrections have different temperature powers.
The small parameter is T/TF=0.10. Its square is 0.01, so the chemical-potential fractional decrease is (9.87/12)×0.01=0.008225.
Thus μ/EF≈0.991775. The leading heat-capacity ratio is (9.87/2)×0.10=0.4935.
Energy rises quadratically with temperature in the expansion, so differentiating gives heat capacity linear in temperature. The chemical-potential shift itself remains quadratic because it is determined by the fixed-number condition.
μ is about 0.9918 EF and CV about 0.4935 NkB. These are leading low-temperature estimates, not exact values at all temperatures.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · probability
Compare fluctuations of fermionic states
For each fresh run Reset and set BOTH probability p=0.5, trials n=20; then Reset and set p=0.1, n=20. Predict count variances 5 and 1.8. These can represent independent equal-energy states at two chosen Fermi occupations. The model does not vary temperature, chemical potential, or a momentum distribution.
- Mean · np
- 5
- Variance · np(1−p)
- 2.5
- Total probability
- 1
These are exact binomial probabilities for independent trials with one fixed success probability. Playback tours the distribution; it does not resample outcomes. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forOccupation fluctuations are greatest near half filling and suppressed near empty or full states.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
At zero temperature, increase the density of a uniform nonrelativistic ideal Fermi gas by eight while keeping mass and internal degeneracy fixed. Find the changes in kF, EF, mean energy per particle, and pressure.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Count the powers of n in kF, then use EF proportional to kF² and P proportional to nEF.
Compare with the solution
kF doubles and EF increases fourfold. Mean energy per particle, 3EF/5, also quadruples. Pressure rises by eight times four, a factor of 32. The new momenta must still remain nonrelativistic and interactions negligible for these ideal-gas scalings to apply.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Pauli filling sets a density-dependent Fermi energy and nonzero zero-temperature pressure.
- The Sommerfeld expansion requires a smooth spectrum near μ and T≪TF.
- Fixed number determines μ(T); the leading three-dimensional heat capacity is linear in T.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.