A regular sonic transition selects spherical accretion
Derive an isothermal Bondi rate using the sonic critical point and reservoir boundary conditions.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- State the isothermal spherical reservoir assumptions.
- Use regularity to identify the sonic radius.
- Separate the Bondi capture scale from an emission or horizon scale.
Spherical inflow provides a useful contrast to a disk: when angular momentum is negligible, the central constraint is a smooth transition from a nearly static reservoir to supersonic accretion. A dimensional mass-capture estimate leaves an undetermined coefficient. Imposing a regular sonic transition and a specified outer reservoir fixes that coefficient in the isothermal Bondi model. Neither step identifies the luminosity of a real compact object without additional cooling physics.
Choose a reservoir and an equation of state
Work in the rest frame of a Newtonian point-mass accretor. Assume steady spherical flow, negligible gas self-gravity, no dynamically important angular momentum or magnetic field, and a static uniform reservoir at large radius. Let u be the positive inward speed, so the radial vector velocity is minus u. In the isothermal model pressure equals density times a constant sound speed squared. Keeping this temperature constant requires heat exchange; it is not the same thermodynamic closure as an adiabatically compressed gas.
Define the Bondi radius as rB=GM/cₛ². Some authors put a factor of two in a capture-radius definition, so the convention must accompany any quoted size. Balancing gravity with thermal motions gives this characteristic scale, while continuity suggests a rate proportional to density times (GM)² divided by sound speed cubed. A moving accretor encountering a supersonic wind is a different boundary problem. Substituting a relative speed into a dimensional expression does not turn that problem into the exact static-reservoir Bondi solution.
The sonic point must make numerator and denominator vanish
A transonic branch has u=cₛ at some finite radius. A smooth derivative there requires the right-hand side of the wind equation to vanish too, selecting rₛ=GM/(2cₛ²)=rB/2. This is a regularity condition, not an extra force. Subsonic breeze-like branches and other mathematical solutions exist for different inner boundary choices. The accretion solution considered here connects a static outer reservoir to an inward supersonic branch that the chosen central sink can absorb.
The isothermal Bernoulli relation contains cₛ² ln(ρ/ρ∞), with a dimensionless logarithm. At infinity the inward speed and potential vanish. Evaluating the same constant at the sonic point yields ρₛ/ρ∞=exp(3/2). Substituting that density, speed and radius into continuity fixes the rate. A polytropic or radiatively heated flow has a changing sound speed and generally a different coefficient and critical structure. In particular one cannot carry this isothermal density enhancement unchanged into every adiabatic model.
Capture and radiation remain separate inference problems
The sound-speed dependence makes a Bondi estimate sensitive to how the distant gas temperature is measured. Unresolved density gradients, multiphase gas, feedback heating, turbulent support and residual rotation can all change the supplied rate. A small angular momentum can become important after contraction and produce a disk inside the capture scale. A black-hole horizon belongs to relativistic inner geometry, whereas rB reflects outer gas conditions. Multiplying the model capture rate by a guessed constant efficiency does not by itself establish a measured bolometric luminosity.
The function lab checks just the mass dependence. Hold the reservoir density and sound speed fixed, and identify x with central mass divided by a reference mass. Reset and set both controls to a=1,x=1, predicting y=1. Reset and set a=1,x=2, predicting y=4. This matches the quadratic mass scaling of the conditional capture rate. It does not integrate a flow, locate a sonic point, include feedback, or determine what fraction of captured material reaches an inner object.
Work it through
Evaluate an isothermal sonic point and capture rate
For a hypothetical static reservoir take GM=10²⁰ m³/s², cₛ=10⁵ m/s and ρ∞=10⁻¹⁶ kg/m³. Use e³ᐟ²≈4.48. Find rB, rₛ and the isothermal transonic rate.
The defined Bondi radius is GM/cₛ²=10²⁰/10¹⁰=10¹⁰ m. Regularity places the sonic point at half that radius, rₛ=5×10⁹ m.
The sonic density is e³ᐟ²ρ∞≈4.48×10⁻¹⁶ kg/m³, while the inward sonic speed remains cₛ. Isothermality is needed for both statements.
The rate is π×4.48×10⁴⁰×10⁻¹⁶/10¹⁵=4.48π×10⁹≈1.41×10¹⁰ kg/s. Direct substitution of the sonic quantities into continuity gives the same value.
With the stated isothermal reservoir, rB=10¹⁰ m, rₛ=5×10⁹ m and ṀB≈1.41×10¹⁰ kg/s.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · function
Test one conditional capture-rate scaling
Identify x=M/M₀ and y=ṀB/ṀB,₀ at fixed reservoir density and sound speed. Reset and set BOTH controls a=1,x=1: predict 1. Reset and set a=1,x=2: predict 4. This quadratic instrument has no spherical fluid equations, sonic transition or feedback.
- y at chosen x
- 0.608
- Tangent slope · 2ax
- 1.35
- Signed area · ax³/3
- 0.182
This lab uses only y = ax². Playback traces the curve within the fixed integration interval from 0 to x; it does not estimate numerical error or change the chosen point. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThe quadratic mass dependence assumes the same reservoir and thermodynamic closure.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Keep the accretor mass fixed, but compare two isothermal reservoirs. The second has twice the sound speed and four times the density at infinity. Find the ratios of Bondi radius, sonic radius and capture rate.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Both radii scale as cₛ⁻², while the rate scales as ρ∞cₛ⁻³.
Compare with the solution
Both radii shrink by a factor of four, so their second-to-first ratios are 1/4. The capture-rate ratio is 4/2³=1/2. A denser reservoir can therefore supply a smaller rate if its sound speed also increases. This comparison assumes both reservoirs admit the same steady isothermal transonic boundary problem.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- The outer reservoir and equation of state specify the Bondi problem.
- Sonic regularity fixes the isothermal critical radius and rate coefficient.
- Capture rate, inner accretion rate and radiative output need separate modeling.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.