research38 min studyLesson 443 in Physics

Optimize information over quantum measurements

Define the symmetric logarithmic derivative, derive pure-state quantum Fisher information, and distinguish an informative state from an informative readout.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Define the SLD and quantum Fisher information for a smooth one-parameter state family.
  • Calculate pure-state information from generator variance.
  • Explain why quantum information can exceed the information of a chosen measurement.

Classical Fisher information answers how informative a particular readout is. Quantum Fisher information asks how much local information the encoded state makes available when measurements are optimized. These are different optimization problems. A state may carry substantial information while a convenient detector misses it completely. The symmetric logarithmic derivative provides the operator that connects the derivative of a density matrix to the best locally achievable measurement information for a single parameter.

Define the local quantum score

For a differentiable state family ρλ\rho_\lambda, the symmetric logarithmic derivative LλL_\lambda is Hermitian and satisfies a symmetrized operator equation. This is the quantum counterpart of relating a probability derivative to its logarithmic derivative. The symmetrization matters because density matrices and their derivatives need not commute. Quantum Fisher information is the expectation of Lλ2L_\lambda^2. It is nonnegative and carries the inverse square of the parameter unit, just as classical information does.

For full-rank states the SLD is uniquely determined. If the state has a kernel, some operator components can be undetermined without changing information on the supported state; rank-changing points need care. An eigenbasis measurement of the SLD attains the quantum information locally for the regular one-parameter problem. Its basis can depend on the unknown parameter, so this statement describes a local optimum rather than an automatically implementable detector covering every parameter value. No actual instrument is specified merely by calculating the optimum.

∂λρλ=Lλρλ+ρλLλ2,FQ(λ)=Tr⁡(ρλLλ2),FC≤FQ\partial_\lambda\rho_\lambda=\frac{L_\lambda\rho_\lambda+\rho_\lambda L_\lambda}{2},\qquad F_Q(\lambda)=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho_\lambda L_\lambda^2),\qquad F_C\le F_Q
These definitions concern a smooth single-parameter density-matrix family. FC is the classical information for any selected POVM. Both information quantities have units λ⁻²; equality requires a suitable measurement and appropriate local regularity.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Reduce a pure unitary family to generator variance

For a normalized pure state, differentiating the state vector gives a tangent. The component parallel to the state changes only its overall phase and cannot distinguish physical states. Subtracting that component leaves the physically meaningful tangent, whose squared norm gives quantum Fisher information up to a factor of four. Under encoding ∣ψλ⟩=exp⁡(−iλG)∣ψ0⟩\lvert\psi_\lambda\rangle=\exp(-i\lambda G)\lvert\psi_0\rangle with a parameter-independent Hermitian generator, the result is four times its variance in the input state. An eigenstate of the generator therefore has zero information.

For a qubit phase rotation generated by G=σz/2G=\sigma_z/2, the state at polar angle θ\theta has generator variance sin⁡2θ/4\sin^2\theta/4 and phase information sin⁡2θ\sin^2\theta. The equator maximizes it, while either pole gives zero. The azimuth chooses the initial direction but does not change this phase information. This result describes a pure state with unitary encoding. Replacing a noisy mixed sensor by a point on the surface of the Bloch sphere would erase the physical decoherence that the information calculation is supposed to include.

FQ=4(⟨∂λψ∣∂λψ⟩−∣⟨ψ∣∂λψ⟩∣2)=4Var⁡(G),FQ,ϕ=sin⁡2θF_Q=4\left(\langle\partial_\lambda\psi|\partial_\lambda\psi\rangle-|\langle\psi|\partial_\lambda\psi\rangle|^2\right)=4\operatorname{Var}(G),\qquad F_{Q,\phi}=\sin^2\theta
The first equality applies to normalized differentiable pure states. The variance form assumes exp(−iλG) with G independent of λ. The qubit expression uses G = σz/2 and polar angle θ; phase and θ are in radians when differentiated.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Keep state information separate from detector information

Measuring the z populations of this rotating pure qubit gives no phase dependence at any polar angle. Its classical phase information is zero even when the quantum information is positive. A rotated readout can access the transverse motion. Thus a failed detector does not prove the preparation lacks metrological value. Conversely, a large calculated quantum information is only an upper limit on what a restricted detector can extract. Include detection noise and accessible operations before claiming an experimental advantage.

Information also depends on which quantity is being estimated. If phase is an angular-frequency offset multiplied by a known interrogation time, frequency information gains the square of that time. Repetitions multiply information for independent identical copies. Neither conversion creates information for free: longer coherent interaction costs time and may increase decoherence, while more copies cost preparation and measurement resources. State the generator normalization before comparing papers, since doubling the generator doubles the phase response and quadruples the numerical information at a fixed parameter convention.

Information carried by a tilted qubit

A pure qubit has polar angle θ=60∘\theta=60^\circ and undergoes U=exp⁡(−iωtσz/2)U=\exp(-i\omega t\sigma_z/2) for t=0.020 st=0.020\,\mathrm s. Compute its phase and angular-frequency quantum information and the frequency bound for one hundred independent copies. Compare a z-population readout.

  1. The generator variance for phase is sin⁡2(60∘)/4=(3/4)/4=3/16\sin^2(60^\circ)/4=(3/4)/4=3/16. Multiplication by four gives FQ,ϕ=3/4F_{Q,\phi}=3/4.

  2. Convert to angular frequency using the known duration: FQ,ω=t2FQ,ϕ=0.0004(3/4)=0.0003 s2F_{Q,\omega}=t^2F_{Q,\phi}=0.0004(3/4)=0.0003\,\mathrm{s^2} per copy.

  3. One hundred independent copies give 0.030 s20.030\,\mathrm{s^2}, so the regular locally unbiased standard-deviation bound is 1/0.030≈5.77 rad s−11/\sqrt{0.030}\approx5.77\,\mathrm{rad\,s^{-1}}. The z populations are constant under this rotation, hence their classical phase information is zero.

The result

The state has nonzero local frequency information, but a z-population measurement alone extracts none of it. Approaching the quantum bound requires an appropriate phase-sensitive measurement and estimator.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · quantum

Compare transverse motion at different polar angles

Reset and set θ = 30 degrees and φ = 0 degrees; predict Bloch x = 0.5. Compare with a fresh Reset and θ = 90 degrees, φ = 0 degrees, where x = 1. Vary phase or Step to see the different transverse circles while z populations remain fixed. The corresponding theoretical phase informations are 0.25 and 1, which the lab does not calculate. It shows pure-state geometry, without mixed states, SLD operators, detector optimization, or noise.

Compare transverse motion at different polar anglesA normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Current readings: Probability |0⟩: 71.1%; Probability |1⟩: 28.9%; Bloch (x, y, z): 0.78, 0.45, 0.42. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.xyz|0⟩|1⟩Basis probabilitiesP(0)71.1%P(1)28.9%
Bloch vector / P(0)P(1)Phase latitude
Probability |0⟩
71.1%
Probability |1⟩
28.9%
Bloch (x, y, z)
0.78, 0.45, 0.42
t = 0 s

A normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThe extent of motion transverse to the generator axis determines pure-qubit phase information.

Check your understanding

A pure state is an eigenstate of the parameter-independent generator G in exp(−iλG). What is its quantum Fisher information about λ?

Try it yourself

For the same pure-qubit phase generator, set θ=30∘\theta=30^\circ and use sixty-four independent copies. Find total phase quantum information and its local standard-deviation bound. Would a fixed z measurement attain it?

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Square the sine of the polar angle, then add information across copies.

Compare with the solution

Each copy has FQ,ϕ=sin⁡2(30∘)=1/4F_{Q,\phi}=\sin^2(30^\circ)=1/4. Sixty-four copies give total information 1616, whose inverse square root is 0.25 rad0.25\,\mathrm{rad}. A z measurement has probabilities fixed by the polar angle and therefore has zero phase information. It cannot attain this positive quantum-information bound. A suitable rotated readout is needed, and finite-sample attainability still requires separate examination.

Take it with you

  • The SLD defines quantum Fisher information for a local state family.
  • A pure unitary encoding has information equal to four times generator variance.
  • Quantum information bounds accessible readout information and retains parameter units.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.