advanced31 min studyLesson 59 in Physics

Friedmann cosmology and redshift

Use homogeneous expanding geometry, fluid conservation, and scale-factor normalization to connect redshift with matter and radiation evolution.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Relate cosmological redshift to a normalized scale factor.
  • Derive density scaling for a constant equation-of-state fluid.
  • Read the assumptions and units in the Friedmann equation.

A homogeneous universe can evolve without possessing an external center of expansion. The scale factor describes changing separations between ideal comoving observers, while the Friedmann equation relates that evolution to average energy content and spatial curvature. We will distinguish this large-scale model from bound local systems, derive matter and radiation scaling, and use redshift without treating it as an ordinary Doppler velocity at every distance.

Homogeneity is a model of large scales

Use the FLRW line element ds2=c2dt2−a(t)2[dχ2/(1−Kχ2)+χ2dΩ2]ds^2=c^2dt^2-a(t)^2[d\chi^2/(1-K\chi^2)+\chi^2d\Omega^2]. Here a is dimensionless, chi has length units, and constant K has inverse-length-squared units. Normalize a(t0)=1a(t_0)=1 at the chosen present reference time. Ideal comoving observers have fixed spatial coordinates and proper time t. Exact homogeneity and isotropy are modeling assumptions for the background, not claims that galaxies and empty intergalactic regions have identical local density.

For neighboring comoving points on a fixed-time slice, proper separation scales with a. Gravitationally bound or electromagnetically bound systems do not automatically follow this relation; their internal dynamics determine their size. The Hubble parameter H=a˙/aH=\dot a/a describes the instantaneous fractional expansion rate. It can change with cosmic time, so extrapolating a present value as a constant over the entire cosmic history is generally incorrect.

H≡a˙a,1+z=a(t0)a(te)=1a(te),ν0=νe1+zH\equiv\frac{\dot a}{a},\qquad 1+z=\frac{a(t_0)}{a(t_e)}=\frac1{a(t_e)},\qquad \nu_0=\frac{\nu_e}{1+z}
The redshift relation concerns photons emitted and observed by ideal comoving observers in FLRW. Peculiar velocities and additional gravitational effects can contribute to an observed astronomical redshift.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Energy dilution depends on pressure

Local covariant stress conservation gives ε˙+3H(ε+p)=0\dot\varepsilon+3H(\varepsilon+p)=0 for a homogeneous perfect fluid. It is the expanding-volume energy balance: pressure performs work as the comoving volume changes. For constant equation-of-state parameter w=p/εw=p/\varepsilon, integrating gives ε∝a−3(1+w)\varepsilon\propto a^{-3(1+w)}. This applies to a separately conserved component with constant w; interacting components or changing equations of state require their own evolution equations.

Cold matter has negligible pressure, so its density falls as inverse volume, a−3a^{-3}. Radiation additionally loses energy per photon as wavelengths stretch, giving a−4a^{-4}. A cosmological-constant component has w=−1w=-1 and constant energy density. Photon redshift in an expanding geometry is not evidence for a missing local conservation law: a general FLRW background lacks the global time-translation symmetry that would supply an ordinary conserved total photon energy.

ε˙+3H(ε+p)=0,p=wε ⟹ ε(a)=ε0a−3(1+w)\dot\varepsilon+3H(\varepsilon+p)=0,\qquad p=w\varepsilon\ \Longrightarrow\ \varepsilon(a)=\varepsilon_0a^{-3(1+w)}
Epsilon and pressure both have energy-density units. The integrated expression assumes constant w, a present normalization of one, and no exchange with other components.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Expansion is determined by an equation, not a picture

With our Riemann and signature conventions write the cosmological field equation as Gμν−Λgμν=8πGTμν/c4G_{\mu\nu}-\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=8\pi G T_{\mu\nu}/c^4, defining positive Lambda to contribute positive vacuum expansion. The FLRW time-time equation is H2=8πGε/(3c2)−Kc2/a2+Λc2/3H^2=8\pi G\varepsilon/(3c^2)-Kc^2/a^2+\Lambda c^2/3. Here epsilon excludes any vacuum energy already counted through Lambda; counting both would double the same contribution.

For flat geometry with only pressureless matter and no Lambda, the expanding solution has a∝t2/3a\propto t^{2/3} after choosing the big-bang time origin. A radiation-only counterpart has a∝t1/2a\propto t^{1/2}. These are idealized eras, not complete descriptions of the observed universe. Determining cosmic distances requires integrating the expansion history; redshift alone does not supply a unique proper distance or a universally valid recession speed through the special-relativistic Doppler formula.

H2=8πG3c2ε−Kc2a2+Λc23H^2=\frac{8\pi G}{3c^2}\varepsilon-\frac{Kc^2}{a^2}+\frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}
Every term has inverse-time-squared units. K describes spatial curvature in the length-valued comoving radial convention; Lambda has inverse-length-squared units and is defined positive for de Sitter expansion.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

A photon and two conserved fluids

An ideal comoving source emits a photon when ae=0.25a_e=0.25, with a0=1a_0=1 today. A separately conserved matter component and radiation component each have a specified present density. Find the redshift, photon frequency ratio, and each early-to-present density ratio.

  1. The scale-factor relation gives 1+z=1/0.25=41+z=1/0.25=4, hence z=3z=3. This is not a claim that the source’s special-relativistic speed is three times c.

  2. Photon frequency scales inversely with a, so ν0/νe=1/4\nu_0/\nu_e=1/4. A photon emitted at 8×1014 Hz8\times10^{14}\,\mathrm{Hz} would be observed at 2×1014 Hz2\times10^{14}\,\mathrm{Hz} under the stated idealization.

  3. Matter was denser by 0.25−3=640.25^{-3}=64, while radiation was denser by 0.25−4=2560.25^{-4}=256. Their ratio was therefore four times larger in favor of radiation than it is today.

The result

Redshift and fluid dilution follow from the same normalized scale factor, but radiation carries one extra inverse power because each photon also redshifts.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · spectral

Modes and the limits of the analogy

Change mode count N and coefficient decay p in the finite sum Σ sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Compare how short spatial features enter when more modes are retained, while playback advances the common temporal phase.

Modes and the limits of the analogyA finite sum of sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Playback changes t; increasing the cutoff includes finer spatial scales. This is not a proof about a continuum limit or renormalization. Current readings: Sum at x = π/2: 0.867; Smallest wavelength: 2π / 5; Highest-mode coefficient: 0.2. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.01.573.144.716.28−2.56−1.2801.282.56x · radiansFinite sine sum
Finite sumHighest included mode
Sum at x = π/2
0.867
Smallest wavelength
2π / 5
Highest-mode coefficient
0.2
t = 0 s

A finite sum of sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Playback changes t; increasing the cutoff includes finer spatial scales. This is not a proof about a continuum limit or renormalization. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThis illustrates a finite spatial-mode description only. It does not expand wavelengths with an FLRW scale factor, evolve cosmological perturbations, or integrate the Friedmann equation.

Check your understanding

Why does separately conserved radiation scale as a⁻⁴ rather than a⁻³ in FLRW?

Try it yourself

A separately conserved fluid has constant w=1/3w=1/3. When the scale factor grows from 0.5 to 1, by what factor does its energy density change? For flat matter-only expansion, how does cosmic time change when a doubles?

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

First use the fluid exponent, then invert the matter-only relation between scale factor and time.

Compare with the solution

For w=1/3w=1/3, the exponent is −3(1+w)=−4-3(1+w)=-4, so doubling a reduces the density by 24=162^4=16. In the separate flat matter-only model a∝t2/3a\propto t^{2/3}, so doubling a multiplies t by 23/2≃2.8282^{3/2}\simeq2.828. These are two distinct model statements: the second assumes matter dominates the expansion and should not be substituted into a radiation-dominated era.

Take it with you

  • Normalize the scale factor before interpreting redshift and density ratios.
  • Matter and radiation dilute differently because radiation energy also redshifts.
  • Friedmann evolution assumes a homogeneous background and must not double-count vacuum energy.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.