Friedmann cosmology and redshift
Use homogeneous expanding geometry, fluid conservation, and scale-factor normalization to connect redshift with matter and radiation evolution.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Relate cosmological redshift to a normalized scale factor.
- Derive density scaling for a constant equation-of-state fluid.
- Read the assumptions and units in the Friedmann equation.
A homogeneous universe can evolve without possessing an external center of expansion. The scale factor describes changing separations between ideal comoving observers, while the Friedmann equation relates that evolution to average energy content and spatial curvature. We will distinguish this large-scale model from bound local systems, derive matter and radiation scaling, and use redshift without treating it as an ordinary Doppler velocity at every distance.
Homogeneity is a model of large scales
Use the FLRW line element . Here a is dimensionless, chi has length units, and constant K has inverse-length-squared units. Normalize at the chosen present reference time. Ideal comoving observers have fixed spatial coordinates and proper time t. Exact homogeneity and isotropy are modeling assumptions for the background, not claims that galaxies and empty intergalactic regions have identical local density.
For neighboring comoving points on a fixed-time slice, proper separation scales with a. Gravitationally bound or electromagnetically bound systems do not automatically follow this relation; their internal dynamics determine their size. The Hubble parameter describes the instantaneous fractional expansion rate. It can change with cosmic time, so extrapolating a present value as a constant over the entire cosmic history is generally incorrect.
Energy dilution depends on pressure
Local covariant stress conservation gives for a homogeneous perfect fluid. It is the expanding-volume energy balance: pressure performs work as the comoving volume changes. For constant equation-of-state parameter , integrating gives . This applies to a separately conserved component with constant w; interacting components or changing equations of state require their own evolution equations.
Cold matter has negligible pressure, so its density falls as inverse volume, . Radiation additionally loses energy per photon as wavelengths stretch, giving . A cosmological-constant component has and constant energy density. Photon redshift in an expanding geometry is not evidence for a missing local conservation law: a general FLRW background lacks the global time-translation symmetry that would supply an ordinary conserved total photon energy.
Expansion is determined by an equation, not a picture
With our Riemann and signature conventions write the cosmological field equation as , defining positive Lambda to contribute positive vacuum expansion. The FLRW time-time equation is . Here epsilon excludes any vacuum energy already counted through Lambda; counting both would double the same contribution.
For flat geometry with only pressureless matter and no Lambda, the expanding solution has after choosing the big-bang time origin. A radiation-only counterpart has . These are idealized eras, not complete descriptions of the observed universe. Determining cosmic distances requires integrating the expansion history; redshift alone does not supply a unique proper distance or a universally valid recession speed through the special-relativistic Doppler formula.
Work it through
A photon and two conserved fluids
An ideal comoving source emits a photon when , with today. A separately conserved matter component and radiation component each have a specified present density. Find the redshift, photon frequency ratio, and each early-to-present density ratio.
The scale-factor relation gives , hence . This is not a claim that the source’s special-relativistic speed is three times c.
Photon frequency scales inversely with a, so . A photon emitted at would be observed at under the stated idealization.
Matter was denser by , while radiation was denser by . Their ratio was therefore four times larger in favor of radiation than it is today.
Redshift and fluid dilution follow from the same normalized scale factor, but radiation carries one extra inverse power because each photon also redshifts.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · spectral
Modes and the limits of the analogy
Change mode count N and coefficient decay p in the finite sum Σ sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Compare how short spatial features enter when more modes are retained, while playback advances the common temporal phase.
- Sum at x = π/2
- 0.867
- Smallest wavelength
- 2π / 5
- Highest-mode coefficient
- 0.2
A finite sum of sin(nx − t)/nᵖ. Playback changes t; increasing the cutoff includes finer spatial scales. This is not a proof about a continuum limit or renormalization. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThis illustrates a finite spatial-mode description only. It does not expand wavelengths with an FLRW scale factor, evolve cosmological perturbations, or integrate the Friedmann equation.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
A separately conserved fluid has constant . When the scale factor grows from 0.5 to 1, by what factor does its energy density change? For flat matter-only expansion, how does cosmic time change when a doubles?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
First use the fluid exponent, then invert the matter-only relation between scale factor and time.
Compare with the solution
For , the exponent is , so doubling a reduces the density by . In the separate flat matter-only model , so doubling a multiplies t by . These are two distinct model statements: the second assumes matter dominates the expansion and should not be substituted into a radiation-dominated era.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Normalize the scale factor before interpreting redshift and density ratios.
- Matter and radiation dilute differently because radiation energy also redshifts.
- Friedmann evolution assumes a homogeneous background and must not double-count vacuum energy.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.