advanced30 min studyLesson 56 in Physics

Schwarzschild orbits and perihelion precession

Use a spherical vacuum geometry, conserved geodesic quantities, and a controlled orbital correction to predict perihelion advance.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • State the assumptions behind the Schwarzschild exterior metric.
  • Reduce equatorial geodesics using energy and angular momentum constants.
  • Estimate a perihelion advance and check its weak-field regime.

Newtonian two-body orbits close into ellipses under an inverse-square force. The exterior geometry of a nonrotating spherical body predicts a small departure: the ellipse’s perihelion slowly advances. Rather than adding an unexplained force, we will obtain this behavior from geodesics in the Schwarzschild metric. The same framework also reveals where weak-field orbital reasoning fails and where stable circular motion ceases to exist.

A vacuum exterior with a mass parameter

For a spherically symmetric vacuum region with zero cosmological constant, the Schwarzschild geometry can be written using f(r)=1−rs/rf(r)=1-r_s/r and rs=2GM/c2r_s=2GM/c^2. The coordinate r is the areal radius: spheres at fixed r have area 4πr24\pi r^2. It is not generally the proper radial distance measured along a static spatial slice. For an ordinary spherical star this vacuum metric applies only outside its surface, not throughout its matter-filled interior.

The familiar static chart applies to stationary observers only where r>rsr>r_s. A rotating source requires a different geometry, and a test body’s self-gravity is neglected here. Spherical symmetry lets us choose the orbit in the equatorial plane. Time-translation and rotation symmetries then supply two constants along an affine geodesic, making a four-dimensional motion problem considerably more manageable. Neither conserved constant should be confused with a locally measured coordinate velocity.

ds2=f(r)c2dt2−f(r)−1dr2−r2(dϑ2+sin⁡2ϑ dφ2),f(r)=1−2GMrc2ds^2=f(r)c^2dt^2-f(r)^{-1}dr^2-r^2(d\vartheta^2+\sin^2\vartheta\,d\varphi^2),\qquad f(r)=1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}
This uses the module’s mostly-minus signature. For timelike test motion ds squared equals c squared times proper time squared; null motion has zero interval.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Constants turn the orbit into a radial problem

For timelike equatorial motion define specific energy E=fc2dt/dτ\mathcal E=fc^2dt/d\tau and specific angular momentum ℓ=r2dφ/dτ\ell=r^2d\varphi/d\tau. The normalization of four-velocity becomes a radial first integral. Far away, E\mathcal E tends to the special-relativistic energy per unit rest mass for a trajectory reaching that region. Near the source, a static observer’s measured particle energy also includes that observer’s gravitational clock normalization.

The effective radial potential includes a relativistic term absent from Newtonian mechanics. Setting u=1/ru=1/r gives an orbital equation with correction 3GMu2/c23GMu^2/c^2. For a weakly perturbed bound ellipse this correction shifts the radial oscillation frequency relative to the azimuthal angle, so successive closest approaches occur slightly beyond one full revolution. The orbital shape is therefore not one permanently fixed ellipse in an inertial plane.

(drdτ)2+f(c2+ℓ2r2)=E2c2,d2udφ2+u=GMℓ2+3GMc2u2\left(\frac{dr}{d\tau}\right)^2+f\left(c^2+\frac{\ell^2}{r^2}\right)=\frac{\mathcal E^2}{c^2},\qquad \frac{d^2u}{d\varphi^2}+u=\frac{GM}{\ell^2}+\frac{3GM}{c^2}u^2
The first equation follows from timelike normalization and the conserved quantities. The second assumes nonzero angular momentum and describes the same timelike equatorial geodesic.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Check the size and scope of the correction

To leading post-Newtonian order, the advance per radial orbit is Δφ=6πGM/[a(1−e2)c2]\Delta\varphi=6\pi GM/[a(1-e^2)c^2], where a and e refer to the leading Newtonian ellipse. The small parameter is GM/[a(1−e2)c2]GM/[a(1-e^2)c^2], not just the eccentricity. A very eccentric orbit can visit strong gravity even if its semimajor axis is large. The formula excludes perturbations from other planets, source rotation, and source multipole structure.

Exact Schwarzschild geodesics also show that stable circular timelike orbits require r>6GM/c2r>6GM/c^2. The equality is marginal stability, while smaller circular timelike orbits that exist are unstable until the photon-orbit boundary at 3GM/c23GM/c^2. The event horizon is at 2GM/c22GM/c^2, a separate radius with a different meaning. Mixing these three scales hides the distinction between orbital stability, null trapping, and causal escape.

A deliberately weak-field orbit

An idealized source has GM/c2=1 kmGM/c^2=1\,\mathrm{km}. A test body has leading orbital parameters a=1000 kma=1000\,\mathrm{km} and e=0.1e=0.1. Estimate the perihelion advance per orbit.

  1. The orbital length scale is a(1−e2)=1000(0.99)=990 kma(1-e^2)=1000(0.99)=990\,\mathrm{km}. The expansion parameter is therefore 1/990≃0.001011/990\simeq0.00101, small compared with one.

  2. Insert it into the leading correction: Δφ=6π/990≃0.01904\Delta\varphi=6\pi/990\simeq0.01904 radians per radial orbit.

  3. Convert using 180/π180/\pi degrees per radian to obtain approximately 1.0911.091 degrees. This toy result is an orbital prediction, not a statement about the measured precession of a particular planet.

The result

The perihelion advances by about 1.09 degrees per orbit at leading order. The calculation is meaningful because its dimensionless expansion parameter is explicitly small.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · spacetime

Retain the local light-cone constraint

Vary relative velocity β and event time ct for the fixed x = 0.6 event in flat spacetime. Check that Lorentz transformations preserve causal classification while changing the event coordinates.

Retain the local light-cone constraintA fixed x = 0.6 event is Lorentz transformed with c = 1. Playback highlights the relation between coordinate descriptions; it does not move the event. Current readings: Lorentz factor γ: 1.12; Event x′: 0.168; Event ct′: 0.817. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.−4.69−2.3502.354.69−2.2−1.101.12.2x or x′ · c = 1ct or ct′EE′ct² − x² = 0.64
Original eventTransformed eventLight cone
Lorentz factor γ
1.12
Event x′
0.168
Event ct′
0.817
t = 0 s

A fixed x = 0.6 event is Lorentz transformed with c = 1. Playback highlights the relation between coordinate descriptions; it does not move the event. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThis illustrates the local special-relativistic structure used by orbital observers. It does not show a Schwarzschild orbit, integrate a radial effective potential, or calculate perihelion precession.

Check your understanding

Which length controls the leading weak-field perihelion correction for a bound ellipse?

Try it yourself

For the same source, double a to 2000 km2000\,\mathrm{km} while keeping e=0.1e=0.1. Find the new leading precession and compare the orbital radius r=5GM/c2r=5GM/c^2 with the stable circular-orbit condition.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

The leading precession is inversely proportional to a, but the exact circular stability condition is a separate statement.

Compare with the solution

Doubling a halves the leading advance to 6π/1980≃0.009526\pi/1980\simeq0.00952 radians, or about 0.5450.545 degrees per orbit. A circular timelike orbit at r=5GM/c2r=5GM/c^2 is below 6GM/c26GM/c^2 and is unstable, although it lies outside both the horizon and the photon orbit. A weak-field precession estimate should not be used to analyze that strong-field circular orbit’s stability.

Take it with you

  • The Schwarzschild exterior describes a spherical vacuum region, with areal radius distinct from proper radial distance.
  • Geodesic symmetries supply useful conserved energy and angular momentum quantities.
  • Perihelion advance, circular-orbit stability, and the horizon concern different physical questions.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.