Schwarzschild orbits and perihelion precession
Use a spherical vacuum geometry, conserved geodesic quantities, and a controlled orbital correction to predict perihelion advance.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- State the assumptions behind the Schwarzschild exterior metric.
- Reduce equatorial geodesics using energy and angular momentum constants.
- Estimate a perihelion advance and check its weak-field regime.
Newtonian two-body orbits close into ellipses under an inverse-square force. The exterior geometry of a nonrotating spherical body predicts a small departure: the ellipse’s perihelion slowly advances. Rather than adding an unexplained force, we will obtain this behavior from geodesics in the Schwarzschild metric. The same framework also reveals where weak-field orbital reasoning fails and where stable circular motion ceases to exist.
A vacuum exterior with a mass parameter
For a spherically symmetric vacuum region with zero cosmological constant, the Schwarzschild geometry can be written using and . The coordinate r is the areal radius: spheres at fixed r have area . It is not generally the proper radial distance measured along a static spatial slice. For an ordinary spherical star this vacuum metric applies only outside its surface, not throughout its matter-filled interior.
The familiar static chart applies to stationary observers only where . A rotating source requires a different geometry, and a test body’s self-gravity is neglected here. Spherical symmetry lets us choose the orbit in the equatorial plane. Time-translation and rotation symmetries then supply two constants along an affine geodesic, making a four-dimensional motion problem considerably more manageable. Neither conserved constant should be confused with a locally measured coordinate velocity.
Constants turn the orbit into a radial problem
For timelike equatorial motion define specific energy and specific angular momentum . The normalization of four-velocity becomes a radial first integral. Far away, tends to the special-relativistic energy per unit rest mass for a trajectory reaching that region. Near the source, a static observer’s measured particle energy also includes that observer’s gravitational clock normalization.
The effective radial potential includes a relativistic term absent from Newtonian mechanics. Setting gives an orbital equation with correction . For a weakly perturbed bound ellipse this correction shifts the radial oscillation frequency relative to the azimuthal angle, so successive closest approaches occur slightly beyond one full revolution. The orbital shape is therefore not one permanently fixed ellipse in an inertial plane.
Check the size and scope of the correction
To leading post-Newtonian order, the advance per radial orbit is , where a and e refer to the leading Newtonian ellipse. The small parameter is , not just the eccentricity. A very eccentric orbit can visit strong gravity even if its semimajor axis is large. The formula excludes perturbations from other planets, source rotation, and source multipole structure.
Exact Schwarzschild geodesics also show that stable circular timelike orbits require . The equality is marginal stability, while smaller circular timelike orbits that exist are unstable until the photon-orbit boundary at . The event horizon is at , a separate radius with a different meaning. Mixing these three scales hides the distinction between orbital stability, null trapping, and causal escape.
Work it through
A deliberately weak-field orbit
An idealized source has . A test body has leading orbital parameters and . Estimate the perihelion advance per orbit.
The orbital length scale is . The expansion parameter is therefore , small compared with one.
Insert it into the leading correction: radians per radial orbit.
Convert using degrees per radian to obtain approximately degrees. This toy result is an orbital prediction, not a statement about the measured precession of a particular planet.
The perihelion advances by about 1.09 degrees per orbit at leading order. The calculation is meaningful because its dimensionless expansion parameter is explicitly small.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · spacetime
Retain the local light-cone constraint
Vary relative velocity β and event time ct for the fixed x = 0.6 event in flat spacetime. Check that Lorentz transformations preserve causal classification while changing the event coordinates.
- Lorentz factor γ
- 1.12
- Event x′
- 0.168
- Event ct′
- 0.817
A fixed x = 0.6 event is Lorentz transformed with c = 1. Playback highlights the relation between coordinate descriptions; it does not move the event. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThis illustrates the local special-relativistic structure used by orbital observers. It does not show a Schwarzschild orbit, integrate a radial effective potential, or calculate perihelion precession.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
For the same source, double a to while keeping . Find the new leading precession and compare the orbital radius with the stable circular-orbit condition.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
The leading precession is inversely proportional to a, but the exact circular stability condition is a separate statement.
Compare with the solution
Doubling a halves the leading advance to radians, or about degrees per orbit. A circular timelike orbit at is below and is unstable, although it lies outside both the horizon and the photon orbit. A weak-field precession estimate should not be used to analyze that strong-field circular orbit’s stability.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- The Schwarzschild exterior describes a spherical vacuum region, with areal radius distinct from proper radial distance.
- Geodesic symmetries supply useful conserved energy and angular momentum quantities.
- Perihelion advance, circular-orbit stability, and the horizon concern different physical questions.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.