research30 min studyLesson 789 in Physics

Supersymmetry breaking and the Goldstino

Diagnose spontaneous rigid supersymmetry breaking in a stable toy vacuum and distinguish its Goldstino from a pseudomodulus or an explicit mass splitting.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Use auxiliary expectations as order parameters in an actual vacuum.
  • Analyze an O'Raifeartaigh-type F-term obstruction and local scalar stability.
  • Identify the Goldstino and distinguish rigid from gravitational conclusions.

An action can respect supersymmetry while its lowest-energy state fails to do so. In rigid supersymmetry this spontaneous breaking produces a massless fermionic mode, the Goldstino, and a positive vacuum energy relative to the supersymmetric algebra's normalization. A nonzero auxiliary value at an arbitrary field point is not enough: a vacuum and its stability must be established. We will use a canonical three-chiral-field toy model to separate the algebraic obstruction, local fluctuation test, and quantum fate of a classically flat scalar direction.

An order parameter must be evaluated in a vacuum

The positive supercharge anticommutator implies that a normalizable zero-energy vacuum is annihilated by the supercharges in the rigid theory. For canonical matter and gauge kinetic terms, nonzero vacuum F or D expectations make a fermion transformation contain an inhomogeneous constant. This diagnoses spontaneous breaking when the action itself is invariant. Explicitly adding unrelated scalar and fermion mass terms is a different operation: the algebra need not remain a symmetry of that action. Mass splitting alone does not identify which mechanism produced it.

Absence of a finite solution to the F equations also needs interpretation. A potential might approach zero only at infinite field values, leaving a runaway with no normalizable vacuum rather than a stable broken ground state. A zero Witten index is similarly inconclusive without spectral and boundary information. These are practical restrictions on using an algebraic criterion. We will instead inspect a model with a positive-energy classical minimum family and nonnegative transverse curvatures in a stated parameter range, before discussing its remaining quantum stability question.

W=fX+h2XΦ12+mΦ1Φ2,WX=f+h2ϕ12,W1=hXϕ1+mϕ2,W2=mϕ1W=fX+\frac h2X\Phi_1^2+m\Phi_1\Phi_2,\qquad W_X=f+\frac h2\phi_1^2,\qquad W_1=hX\phi_1+m\phi_2,\qquad W_2=m\phi_1
Use canonical Kähler metric, no gauge fields, real positive f, h and m, with dimensions [f] = 2, [h] = 0 and [m] = 1. Scalars have energy units. This is an illustrative O'Raifeartaigh-type model, not a measured particle sector.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

An incompatible pair of equations leaves positive energy

If m is nonzero, setting the second numbered field derivative to zero forces phi one to zero. The X derivative then remains f and cannot vanish when f is nonzero. Thus no finite supersymmetric F-flat configuration exists. For m2>hfm^2>hf, the classical minimum has phi one and phi two zero, while X is arbitrary. The energy density is f squared. Its positivity follows from the complete potential, not from assigning an arbitrary additive constant to a nongravitational scalar potential independently of the supercharge algebra.

At X equal to zero, write phi one as a plus i b divided by square root two. The two real scalar curvatures are m2+hfm^2+hf and m2−hfm^2-hf, while the phi two scalars have mass squared m squared. Both transverse phi-one curvatures are positive in the stated range. The complex X scalar remains classically flat and is called a pseudomodulus. This flatness is not a Goldstone theorem and can be lifted by quantum corrections to the effective action. A complete vacuum analysis must check that lifting rather than calling every flat scalar protected.

ϕ1=ϕ2=0:FX=−f,F1=F2=0,V=f2,ma2=m2+hf,mb2=m2−hf(X=0)\phi_1=\phi_2=0:\qquad F_X=-f,\quad F_1=F_2=0,\quad V=f^2,\qquad m_a^2=m^2+hf,\quad m_b^2=m^2-hf\quad(X=0)
The displayed transverse masses are classical canonical Hessian eigenvalues, with positive stability condition m squared greater than h f. X is a tree-level pseudomodulus. A negative displayed eigenvalue instead identifies an unstable stationary configuration, not a valid local vacuum.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

The Goldstino is the broken-charge fermion direction

In this minimum family only F X is nonzero, so the fermion in X shifts under supersymmetry by a constant proportional to f. It is the Goldstino direction and is massless in the rigid theory under the usual assumptions for a genuine spontaneously broken vacuum. At X equal to zero the other two Weyl fermions form a massive pair through the m term. The Goldstino's protection comes from the broken conserved supercharge; the X scalar's classical flatness has a different origin and need not survive radiative effects.

Coupling gravity changes the discussion. Local supersymmetry allows the Goldstino to be absorbed into the gravitino through the super-Higgs mechanism, and supergravity's scalar potential includes terms absent from the positive rigid sum. One cannot infer the cosmological constant from the simple rigid example without its gravitational completion. Likewise, a proof of a Goldstino in a toy action does not establish an experimentally observed particle. The calculation demonstrates how symmetry, auxiliary order parameters, stability, and low-energy modes fit together within a specified theoretical framework.

A stable transverse spectrum with a Goldstino

Use f=4 GeV2f=4\,\mathrm{GeV^2}, h = 1/2, and m=2 GeVm=2\,\mathrm{GeV} at X, phi one, and phi two all zero. Test the F-flat obstruction, calculate energy and both real phi-one curvatures, and identify the Goldstino.

  1. W-two equals m times phi one, so its vanishing forces phi one to zero. W-X then equals four GeV squared and cannot vanish. The model has no finite all-F-zero configuration.

  2. At the stated point FX=−4 GeV2F_X=-4\,\mathrm{GeV^2} and V=16 GeV4V=16\,\mathrm{GeV^4}. The transverse mass squares are 4+2=6 GeV24+2=6\,\mathrm{GeV^2} and 4−2=2 GeV24-2=2\,\mathrm{GeV^2}, both positive.

  3. Only F-X is nonzero, so the X fermion is the massless Goldstino direction in the rigid broken theory. The X scalar remains a classical pseudomodulus whose quantum lifting must be analyzed separately.

The result

The toy minimum family breaks rigid supersymmetry with V = 16 GeV⁴; the transverse phi-one mass squares are 6 and 2 GeV², and the X fermion is the Goldstino.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · oscillator

Positive curvature gives a stable oscillation scale

Reset and set BOTH Damping ratio ζ = 0 and Natural frequency ω₀ = 1; predict period 2π. For a fresh comparison, Reset and set ζ = 0 and ω₀ = 2; predict period π. Both runs start at x = 1 with velocity zero.

Positive curvature gives a stable oscillation scaleUnit mass, x(0) = 1 and v(0) = 0. The analytic solution includes underdamped, critically damped and overdamped cases; time is measured in seconds. Current readings: Displacement x(t): 1; Velocity v(t): 0; Regime: underdamped. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.02.557.510−1.15−0.5700.571.15Time · sDisplacementunderdamped
Displacement x(t)Current time
Displacement x(t)
1
Velocity v(t)
0
Regime
underdamped
t = 0 s

Unit mass, x(0) = 1 and v(0) = 0. The analytic solution includes underdamped, critically damped and overdamped cases; time is measured in seconds. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThe positive-stiffness classical oscillator illustrates stable curvature scales one and four. It cannot represent a negative mass-squared instability, a Goldstino, a pseudomodulus potential, or a supersymmetry-breaking solver.

Check your understanding

Which scalar feature is distinct from the Goldstino's symmetry protection in this model?

Try it yourself

Keep f=4 GeV2f=4\,\mathrm{GeV^2} and h = 1/2, but reduce m to 1 GeV. At the origin of the three-field space, calculate the two real phi-one mass squares. Is that point still a local minimum, and has the F-flat obstruction disappeared?

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Test the smaller scalar curvature and the algebraic F equations separately; instability and F flatness are different conditions.

Compare with the solution

The mass squares become 1+2=3 GeV21+2=3\,\mathrm{GeV^2} and 1−2=−1 GeV21-2=-1\,\mathrm{GeV^2}. The negative value is a tachyonic curvature, so this stationary point is not a local minimum. The algebraic obstruction remains because m is still nonzero: W-two forces phi one zero and W-X then equals f. One must locate and test the new minimum rather than declare the unstable origin a vacuum or confuse its instability with restoration of supersymmetry.

Take it with you

  • Spontaneous breaking concerns an invariant action and an actual stable vacuum.
  • A Goldstino fermion and a classically flat scalar have different protection mechanisms.
  • Runaways, index boundaries, explicit breaking, and supergravity require distinct arguments.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.