Allocate a mixed anomaly without erasing its class
Use two background connections to distinguish exact global symmetries, dynamical gauge consistency, and counterterm-dependent Ward representatives.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Expand a mixed Abelian anomaly polynomial with correct combinatorial factors.
- Explain what changes when a background symmetry is made dynamical.
- Track how a local counterterm redistributes consistent Ward variations.
Coupling a global symmetry to an external gauge field is a diagnostic, even when that field is never integrated over. It lets the generating functional reveal an obstruction to preserving several background gauge invariances at once. Mixed anomalies involve more than one symmetry or gravity. Their physical meaning depends on which fields are external and which are dynamical, while local counterterms can shift the apparent violation among currents without removing the invariant obstruction.
Promote sources without silently gauging the theory
Let X and Y be Abelian symmetries with background connections and curvatures . A left-handed Weyl field with charges contributes a Chern character with exponent . Background gauge transformations encode Ward identities for the associated currents. They do not add propagating gauge bosons unless the connections are integrated over. An anomalous background response is allowed as data of a global symmetry, whereas an uncanceled redundancy of a dynamical gauge field is an inconsistency.
The distinction also affects whether a continuous symmetry is exact. A current anomalous only in external probes can describe an exact global symmetry at zero sources with a 't Hooft anomaly. If Y is dynamical and X has a nonzero X–Y-squared anomaly, gauge-field configurations can violate X charge even with no external X source. The full continuous X symmetry is then generally explicitly broken by quantum effects, sometimes leaving a discrete subgroup. It should not automatically be treated as an exact symmetry in later anomaly-matching arguments.
Choose which Ward identity remains exact
For the displayed mixed term, a local descent representative can place the connection in the five-form and leave only factors. Its Y gauge variation then vanishes, while its X variation produces a term proportional to . This representative is especially useful when Y is dynamical, because preserving Y gauge invariance is mandatory. Other anomaly terms must still be considered; isolating one mixed term is not a proof that a full spectrum is consistent.
A Bardeen counterterm involving changes the local distribution of consistent anomalies. On a closed patch calculation, its X variation has the opposite sign from its Y variation after integration by parts. One can therefore move a mixed term from one Ward identity to another. If the original anomaly polynomial is nontrivial, however, no allowed four-dimensional local counterterm makes every background symmetry exact simultaneously. The obstruction is in the shared anomaly class, not in one arbitrarily preferred current representative.
Keep counterterm bookkeeping separate from transport
To see the relative signs directly, vary in a locally trivial bundle with boundary terms absent. The result is . This shows precisely what is exchanged. Global bundle patching can restrict counterterms further, so the local expression should not be presented as a universal globally defined functional on every background. Consistent and covariant current redefinitions also require their own specified local polynomials.
An anomalous divergence fixes a source or Ward identity, not a complete constitutive equation. Turning it into a persistent current requires a state, boundary conditions, relaxation mechanisms, and a defined equilibrium or driven limit. In particular, no universal steady magnetic current follows just from reading a mixed polynomial coefficient. Background geometry organizes possible responses and constraints, while actual transport depends on additional dynamics. This separation prevents a regulator-dependent current split from being mistaken for a directly measurable charge-production rate in every physical setup.
Work it through
An XYY anomaly with conserved Y
Two left-handed Weyl fields have charges and . Compute C_XYY, C_XXY, and C_YYY. For the isolated XYY term use the Y-preserving representative and a small variation with . Find its contribution to .
The mixed coefficient is . In contrast, and . Squaring y before multiplying by x is crucial.
The polynomial's mixed part is . Choosing in the five-form allocates this mixed variation to X and preserves Y, giving coefficient in front of the specified integral.
The contribution is . The separate cubic X coefficient is two and its linear gravitational coefficient is also two, so this calculation has not made X anomaly free.
The spectrum has C_XYY = 2, C_XXY = C_YYY = 0, and the specified mixed consistent phase variation is iε in the Y-preserving scheme. Other X-related anomaly terms remain part of the full theory.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · matrix
Change a basis without removing its structure
Reset and set both controls to final scale a = 1 and shear b = 0; predict selected determinant 1. Reset and set both controls to a = 1 and b = 1; predict the same determinant while the selected final map shears the coordinate grid. Geometry starts at the identity after Reset and interpolates during Play; readouts always describe the selected final matrix. This illustrates a change of coordinates only, not background charges, mixed coefficients, or anomaly cancellation.
- Area scale · det A
- 1.4
- Singular values · σmax, σmin
- 1.597, 0.876
- Condition number · κ₂(A)
- 1.823
The selected matrix is A = [[a,b],[0,1]]. Playback interpolates geometry between the identity and A; readouts always describe A. Its determinant is a and its singular values come from AᵀA. Positive a makes every supported matrix invertible. This two-dimensional family is not a general eigensolver or a learned network. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forChanging a representation can rearrange components without removing an invariant obstruction; the matrix lab does not calculate anomaly classes.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Replace the example's charge pairs by and . Recompute C_XYY, C_XXY, C_YYY, and C_XXX. At the same specified background integral and in the same Y-preserving scheme, what is the isolated mixed phase variation?
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
The XYY coefficient is linear in x, whereas the XXX coefficient is cubic in x. Use the unchanged descent normalization.
Compare with the solution
The results are , , , and . The mixed polynomial coefficient is and its variation is . Doubling x doubles this mixed response but multiplies its pure cubic coefficient by eight. The different scaling demonstrates why one coefficient cannot substitute for the complete anomaly audit.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Background probing and dynamical gauging are different operations.
- A counterterm may preserve one Ward identity by shifting violation into another.
- Anomaly coefficients constrain responses but do not alone determine a state-dependent transport current.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.