advanced28 min studyLesson 221 in Physics

Temporal coherence depends on the whole spectrum

Relate time-delay correlations to spectral shape and specify a coherence-width convention.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Define normalized first-order temporal coherence.
  • Transform a Lorentzian spectrum into a correlation envelope.
  • Distinguish spectral FWHM from a chosen coherence-time width.

A beam can be very bright yet produce almost no fringes when combined with a delayed copy of itself. The relevant property is how its field remains correlated across that delay. A spectral width gives a useful time scale, but its numerical conversion depends on spectral shape and on what width we measure. We will make both choices explicit before calculating a coherence length.

Correlation is a measurable comparison

Represent one polarization of the light by a complex analytic field. For statistically stationary light, its average correlation with a delayed copy depends on the delay rather than on the starting time. Normalize by the average intensity to obtain the first-order coherence function. Its magnitude lies between zero and one. A perfectly monochromatic field has a rotating correlation phase but a constant unit magnitude, illustrating why phase evolution alone is not coherence loss.

A detector averages over many optical periods. Combining two copies gives the sum of their separate intensities plus a correlation-dependent cross term. When their intensities are equal and their polarizations match, fringe visibility equals the correlation magnitude. Unequal intensities or a polarization mismatch can reduce visibility even when the field is fully coherent. Therefore a low measured contrast does not identify a broad spectrum until instrumental causes have been checked.

g(1)(τ)=⟨E∗(t)E(t+τ)⟩⟨∣E(t)∣2⟩,V=2I1I2I1+I2∣g(1)(τ)∣g^{(1)}(\tau)=\frac{\langle E^*(t)E(t+\tau)\rangle}{\langle |E(t)|^2\rangle},\qquad V=\frac{2\sqrt{I_1I_2}}{I_1+I_2}|g^{(1)}(\tau)|
The stationary scalar field E is in V/m, delay τ is in seconds, and intensities I₁,I₂ use the same units. Visibility assumes matched polarization and a scan of relative phase.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

A spectral transform fixes the envelope

The Wiener–Khinchin relation connects stationary field correlation to the power spectrum. Each frequency component accumulates a different phase during a delay. At zero delay these contributions align; later their phases spread and partially cancel in the spectral integral. This is a statistical statement about first-order correlation. It does not require a picture of sharply bounded little wave trains whose edges could be read directly from a spectrum.

For a narrow Lorentzian line, use detuning from its optical carrier and take the detuning integral over the real line. Its spectral full width at half maximum is Δν in hertz. The normalized transform has an exponential magnitude with decay rate πΔν. Extending detuning to negative infinity is the usual narrowband idealization, valid when the line width is much smaller than its carrier frequency. It is not a statement that physical light has negative photon energies.

S(ν)∝1(ν−ν0)2+(Δν/2)2,∣g(1)(τ)∣=e−πΔν∣τ∣S(\nu)\propto\frac{1}{(\nu-\nu_0)^2+(\Delta\nu/2)^2},\qquad |g^{(1)}(\tau)|=e^{-\pi\Delta\nu|\tau|}
S is the Lorentzian spectral density, ν₀ is the carrier in Hz, and Δν is its intensity-spectrum FWHM in Hz. The result uses the stationary narrowband Lorentzian detuning model.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

A width needs a definition

Define coherence time here as the positive delay at which the correlation magnitude falls to one over e. The corresponding vacuum coherence length is c times that delay. Some authors instead use an integral of squared coherence, an envelope FWHM, or a rough inverse-bandwidth estimate. Those definitions can all be useful but are not numerically interchangeable. A Gaussian spectral line also has a Gaussian correlation envelope, so replacing its width by the Lorentzian formula introduces another avoidable error.

The waves instrument isolates the interference step rather than the statistical spectral average. For a fresh run, Reset and set both controls to phase difference zero degrees and amplitude ratio one; predict a doubled field amplitude. Reset again and set both to 180 degrees and one; predict cancellation. These are two fixed-frequency coherent sinusoids. Their changing phase does not simulate linewidth, random phase diffusion, or the decay envelope derived above; those require averaging a spectrum or a stationary random process.

A specified Lorentzian linewidth

A stationary narrowband beam has a Lorentzian spectral FWHM of 100 MHz. Find its one-over-e coherence time and vacuum coherence length, then the balanced-beam visibility at twice that delay. Use c=3.00×10⁸ m/s.

  1. Convert the width to 1.00×10⁸ Hz. Set the exponential argument πΔντ equal to one, giving τ=1/(π×10⁸) s, about 3.18 ns.

  2. Multiply the chosen time by c: 3.00×10⁸ times 3.18×10⁻⁹ gives about 0.955 m of optical path difference. This length is not a Michelson mirror displacement.

  3. At twice the one-over-e delay, the exponent is minus two. Matched balanced beams therefore have visibility exp(−2), approximately 0.135; unequal beam intensities would reduce this further.

The result

The stated convention gives 3.18 ns, 0.955 m, and visibility 0.135 at twice that delay.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · waves

Interference before statistical averaging

Reset and set BOTH controls to phase 0° and ratio 1; predict amplitude 2. For a separate run Reset and set phase 180° and ratio 1; predict zero. The fixed-frequency model has no linewidth control.

Interference before statistical averagingTwo waves share the same frequency and wave number. Playback advances t in sin(2x − t) + a sin(2x − t + phase). Current readings: Sum at x = 0: 0.866; Resultant amplitude: 1.732; Phase difference: 60°. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.−3.14−1.5701.573.14−3.4−1.701.73.4x · radiansAmplitude
SumFirst componentSecond component
Sum at x = 0
0.866
Resultant amplitude
1.732
Phase difference
60°
t = 0 s

Two waves share the same frequency and wave number. Playback advances t in sin(2x − t) + a sin(2x − t + phase). Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forAveraging differently phased spectral contributions produces an envelope; one coherent pair alone does not.

Check your understanding

For a Lorentzian line of spectral FWHM Δν, which positive delay gives a one-over-e correlation magnitude?

Try it yourself

A different beam has Lorentzian FWHM 50 MHz. At delay 1/(π×50 MHz), the two interfering intensities are 9 and 1 in common units. Find the visibility and explain why it is below one over e.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

First calculate the intensity-balance factor; then multiply by the correlation magnitude.

Compare with the solution

The coherence magnitude at the specified delay is 1/e. The balance factor is 2√(9×1)/(9+1)=6/10=0.6. Visibility is therefore 0.6/e≈0.221. This reduction combines temporal decorrelation with unequal intensities, so attributing the whole loss to linewidth would overestimate the width.

Take it with you

  • Coherence is a normalized field correlation.
  • A bandwidth-to-time conversion requires spectral shape and a width convention.
  • Contrast also depends on polarization and beam balance.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.