Charged-current chirality and the Fermi limit
Match low-momentum W exchange onto a four-fermion interaction and keep chiral projectors, mass scales, and rate powers consistent.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Write the charged weak current in chiral and V−A conventions.
- Match the tree-level Fermi coefficient with every projector factor included.
- Estimate finite-propagator corrections within the effective theory’s range.
At low momentum transfer a virtual W cannot be resolved as a propagating resonance, and its exchange looks approximately local. This is the setting of Fermi's four-fermion theory. The matching coefficient retains the underlying chiral gauge structure and the Higgs scale even though the heavy field disappears from the effective description. We derive the leading operator at tree level, then identify the corrections that prevent it from being extrapolated to arbitrarily large energy or used as a precision prediction without further work.
The current selects chirality
The charged interaction connects the upper and lower members of a left-chiral doublet. Writing the charged vector fields with a square-root-of-two normalization yields a vertex coefficient g divided by square root of two when the current contains chiral fields. In a four-component notation the left projector is one half of one minus gamma-five. Moving that projector into a V-minus-A current therefore introduces another explicit factor one half at each vertex.
The underlying statement is about chirality, not a universal prohibition on a massive particle of one helicity. A relativistic massive spinor contains a suppressed component of the opposite chirality, and boosts can reverse its helicity. For effectively massless particles the familiar helicity selection emerges, with the corresponding antiparticle assignments. Quark charged currents also contain a unitary mixing matrix after mass diagonalization; a mixing entry multiplies the amplitude, while its modulus squared enters a simple rate comparison only after other factors are controlled.
Match the heavy propagator
For conserved leading currents at momentum much smaller than the W mass, the propagator denominator can be expanded in momentum squared over mass squared. Combining the two g-over-square-root-of-two vertices and the two left projectors gives the conventional Fermi coefficient. In muon decay, one may write the operator as a product of two V-minus-A currents with coefficient minus G-Fermi divided by square root of two. Equivalent Fierz-reordered forms give the same amplitude when fermion labels and signs are handled consistently.
Using the tree-level W mass expresses G-Fermi directly through the vacuum scale. The constant has inverse-energy-squared units, as required for a dimension-six operator built from four fermion fields. The leading neglected propagator terms are suppressed by momentum squared over W mass squared, not merely by a smaller gauge coupling. Near the W pole the expansion fails, and its width and complete gauge-consistent amplitude become relevant. For precision matching, electroweak loops and the definition of the measured Fermi constant must also be specified.
A lifetime is more than its matching coefficient
For a massless final electron and neutrinos at leading order, the muon width scales as G-Fermi squared times the fifth power of the muon mass, divided by a fixed three-body phase-space factor. The fifth power follows from dimensions: the squared coefficient contributes energy to the minus four, so a width needs five powers of the available mass. Physical lifetime extraction additionally includes the electron mass and inclusive electromagnetic corrections.
The same weak coefficient appears in beta decay, but hadronic vector and axial matrix elements replace free elementary currents. Nuclear structure, radiative corrections and phase space cannot be inferred from G-Fermi alone. Likewise, using charged-current universality as a precision test requires consistent input definitions across processes. The effective theory is useful precisely because it separates a short-distance coefficient from long-distance matrix elements and a controlled momentum expansion, rather than asserting all weak rates are identical.
Work it through
Recover the vacuum scale matching coefficient
Use hypothetical g=0.8, mW=100 GeV and v=250 GeV. Compute GF from both tree relations and verify the units and projector normalization.
From the W-exchange relation, GF/√2=0.8²/(8×100²)=0.64/80,000=8.0×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻². Therefore GF=8√2×10⁻⁶≈1.131371×10⁻⁵ GeV⁻².
The vacuum expression gives 1/(2v²)=1/(2×250²)=1/125,000=8.0×10⁻⁶ GeV⁻², exactly the same GF/√2. This also checks mW=gv/2.
Two g/√2 vertices initially supply g²/2. Replacing each left projector by (1−γ5)/2 supplies a further factor 1/4, leaving g²/8 multiplying the two V−A currents before the inverse W-mass-squared factor.
The two matching routes agree: GF≈1.131371×10⁻⁵ GeV⁻², and the conventional V−A normalization requires both projector factors.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · scattering
Separate coupling powers from propagator physics
For each fresh comparison, Reset and set both controls. Reset and set schematic coupling g=0.5 and angle 90 degrees. Predict weight 0.0625. Compare a fresh run with both controls g=1 and angle 90 degrees, giving weight 1, a factor 16 increase. This verifies only the lab’s g⁴ coupling power for a squared toy amplitude. It contains no W propagator, fermion currents, energy control, Fermi matching, or physical cross-section units.
- Coupling factor g⁴
- 0.24
- Angular factor 1 + cos²θ
- 1.329
- Illustrative weight
- 0.319
A schematic term diagram with dimensionless weight g⁴(1 + cos²θ). Lines denote terms, not particle paths; this is not a process cross-section or loop calculation. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA squared two-vertex amplitude can carry a fourth coupling power; its momentum regime and normalization require additional physics.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
Ignore width and numerator corrections for a scalarized propagator comparison. For toy timelike q²=(20 GeV)² and mW=100 GeV, find the exact amplitude multiplier relative to the contact limit and its squared rate multiplier.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Retain 1/(1−q²/mW²), then square the amplitude factor only after evaluating it.
Compare with the solution
Here q²/mW²=400/10,000=0.04. The amplitude multiplier is 1/0.96=25/24≈1.041667, a 4.17% enhancement. Its squared multiplier is 625/576≈1.085069, an 8.51% enhancement. The first-order amplitude expansion gives 1.04 and omits terms starting at 0.04². This deliberately isolated denominator exercise is not a complete corrected decay prediction; other tensor, mass and radiative terms remain outside it.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Charged weak interactions select left chirality, with helicity correspondence only in the appropriate limit.
- The Fermi coefficient includes the charged-field and chiral-projector normalization factors.
- A local four-fermion description requires small momentum transfer and separate control of matrix elements and radiative corrections.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.