Weinberg angle and neutral-current couplings
Rotate neutral gauge fields and track chiral, vector, and axial coupling conventions through measurable parity asymmetries.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Derive the photon and Z rotation from the two gauge couplings.
- Convert chiral Z couplings into vector and axial conventions.
- Compute a toy fermion asymmetry and distinguish angle schemes beyond tree level.
The neutral weak field and the hypercharge field mix because the Higgs vacuum gives mass to only one linear combination. The same rotation that diagonalizes the mass matrix reorganizes the interactions into electric charge and a chiral neutral current. Working through both pieces prevents confusion about factors of two in quoted vector and axial couplings. We use the previous lesson's derivative convention and tree-level parameters, and treat every numerical weak-angle value below as a hypothetical input.
One rotation must diagonalize and couple consistently
Define sine and cosine of the weak angle as g-prime and g divided by their positive combined magnitude. The photon is sine times W-three plus cosine times B; the orthogonal Z is cosine times W-three minus sine times B. Substitution into the gauge interaction gives the photon coefficient g sine T-three plus g-prime cosine Y. The equality of these two coefficients makes the result the elementary coupling times electric charge.
The orthogonal combination has coefficient g over cosine multiplying T-three minus sine squared times electric charge. This formula acts on each chiral field in its own representation. A right-chiral singlet has no T-three but still couples to Z through its nonzero charge. Consequently the word neutral does not mean electrically neutral particles only, nor does it mean identical interactions for the two chiralities. The neutrino and charged lepton therefore probe different combinations of the same gauge parameters.
Coupling dictionaries prevent a factor-of-two error
For a Dirac fermion write the Z interaction with an overall g over cosine and coefficients g-left and g-right multiplying the chiral projectors. Their values are T-three minus Q sine squared and minus Q sine squared, respectively, where T-three is that of the left-chiral partner. Rewriting the projectors gives vector coefficient g-left plus g-right and axial coefficient g-left minus g-right, but introduces an overall one half.
A paper that writes an overall g over twice cosine therefore lists vector and axial numbers different from a paper that keeps g over cosine and divides its vector and axial numbers by two. The predictions agree when the entire normalization is translated. For effectively massless fermions, the parity asymmetry formed from the two squared chiral couplings is also expressible using vector and axial couplings. It depends on their relative weights rather than the common overall gauge factor.
From a parity parameter to a measured observable
Define the fermion asymmetry parameter as left-coupling squared minus right-coupling squared divided by their sum, for real leading couplings and negligible fermion masses. At an ideal isolated Z pole, the forward-backward asymmetry for electron–positron annihilation into a fermion pair is three quarters times the electron and final-fermion asymmetry parameters. Photon interference, radiation, acceptance, finite masses, and loop form factors require corrections before comparing this formula with a measured number.
Beyond tree level, an on-shell angle defined from W and Z masses, a running subtraction-scheme angle, and a fermion-specific effective angle extracted from a vertex need not coincide. The differences are calculable within a specified scheme and order. One cannot insert a fitted effective angle into every bare tree identity and interpret the residual as new physics. Neutral-current tests become powerful by comparing consistently calculated observables, with input correlations and common theoretical uncertainties retained.
Work it through
A toy electron parity asymmetry
Take toy sW²=0.20 for an electron with Q=−1 and T₃=−1/2. Calculate gL, gR, gV, gA, and Ae=(gL²−gR²)/(gL²+gR²).
The chiral coefficients are gL=−0.5+0.20=−0.30 and gR=0.20. Their difference is fixed by T₃ even though both shift with the angle.
Convert conventions: gV=−0.30+0.20=−0.10 and gA=−0.30−0.20=−0.50, used with the overall g/(2cW) vector–axial form.
The numerator is 0.09−0.04=0.05 and denominator 0.09+0.04=0.13, so Ae=5/13≈0.384615. Using 2gVgA/(gV²+gA²) gives the same result.
The toy electron has gV=−0.10, gA=−0.50, and Ae≈0.384615; normalizations agree after the overall factor is included.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · vectors
Inspect orthogonal neutral-field projections
For each fresh comparison, Reset and set both controls. Reset and set angle 30 degrees and magnitude 1. Predict x=√3/2 and y=1/2. Compare a fresh run with both controls angle 60 degrees and magnitude 1, which exchanges those projections while retaining unit magnitude. This real-vector analogy illustrates orthogonal mixing only; it does not calculate electroweak couplings, fit a weak angle, or transform W and B fields.
- x component
- 1.393
- y component
- 0.975
- Magnitude
- 1.7
Playback traces a fixed vector and its projections. Angle and magnitude set the geometry; the moving marker does not change them. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forA normalized basis rotation preserves a length, while its physical coupling coefficients require the interaction Lagrangian.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
At toy sW²=0.25, compare the electron and neutrino chiral couplings and asymmetry parameters. Assume a massless neutrino with no right-chiral singlet interaction.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
A neutrino has Q=0 and T₃=+1/2. Equal magnitudes of electron chiral couplings cancel the parity numerator.
Compare with the solution
The electron has gL=−1/4 and gR=+1/4, so gV=0, gA=−1/2 and Ae=0. The neutrino has gL=+1/2 and gR=0, giving gV=gA=+1/2 and Aν=1. Thus the ideal Z-pole electron-to-neutrino forward-backward asymmetry is (3/4)AeAν=0 despite the neutrino’s purely left-chiral coupling. A vanishing product observable does not imply that both vertices conserve parity.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- The weak rotation aligns the neutral mass eigenstates and produces the electromagnetic coupling.
- Chiral and vector–axial conventions differ by an explicit overall factor two.
- Precision angle comparisons require a specified renormalization scheme and corrected observable.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.