Rigid-rotor levels and rotational spectra
Relate reduced mass and bond length to rotational energies, track frequency versus wavenumber units, and identify electric-dipole and Raman probes.
On this page
The question for today
What you’ll understand
- Calculate rotor energies and adjacent rotational line positions.
- Apply reduced-mass scaling to isotope shifts.
- Distinguish a rigid-rotor model from its spectroscopic corrections and transition mechanisms.
A diatomic molecule can rotate while keeping nearly the same bond length. Quantizing that orientation gives a ladder whose spacings increase with angular momentum, unlike the equally spaced harmonic vibrational ladder. Microwave and Raman measurements can reveal this rotational structure, but they couple through different molecular properties. We will derive the ideal rotor ladder from moment of inertia, distinguish energy, hertz, and reciprocal-centimetre conventions for the rotational constant, and use isotope changes as a controlled test of the mass dependence.
Rotation uses the two-body moment of inertia
For nuclei of masses and separated by a fixed distance , the moment of inertia about a perpendicular center-of-mass axis is , with reduced mass . Using the total molecular mass or placing one nucleus immovably at the origin gives an incorrect inertia except in an appropriate heavy-partner limit. The rigid approximation neglects vibration and centrifugal stretching, and initially assumes an electronic state with no angular-momentum complications.
The rotor Hamiltonian is squared angular momentum divided by twice I. Its eigenfunctions are spherical harmonics, with integer J and projection M from minus J to plus J. The energy depends on J but not M in zero field, giving degeneracy . Molecular spin, electronic orbital motion, hyperfine interactions, and identical-nucleus restrictions can modify the accessible levels or split them; these are additional structures, not failures of angular-momentum quantization itself.
A spectrum requires a coupling as well as levels
A heteronuclear diatomic with a nonzero permanent electric dipole can undergo pure rotational electric-dipole transitions. In the elementary closed-shell rotor model the rule is , with polarization also constraining M. Absorption from J to J plus one has wavenumber . Thus ideal adjacent rotational lines are equally separated even though the levels themselves are not. Confusing level energies with line differences obscures this simple pattern.
A homonuclear molecule has no permanent electric dipole in its isolated symmetric state, so its pure rotational electric-dipole spectrum is absent in this model. Its rotation can still be observed by Raman scattering through anisotropic polarizability. Rotational Raman shifts follow different rules, including for the anisotropic part, while zero shift is elastic. Absence of one dipole spectrum therefore does not imply absence of rotational levels or absence of every spectroscopic probe.
Mass scaling and fitted constants need interpretation
Keeping the electronic equilibrium geometry fixed while doubling reduced mass halves the rotational constant. This leading isotope rule is stronger than merely saying “heavier molecules rotate more slowly” because it identifies the correct mass and the square of bond length. A measured constant in vibrational state v is usually an average over that state’s bond-length distribution rather than exactly the equilibrium constant. Extracting an equilibrium distance therefore requires specifying which rotational constant is used.
At higher J, rotation stretches a flexible bond, raises its inertia, and lowers energies relative to the rigid prediction. The leading negative quartic correction captures that trend over a limited range; extrapolating it indefinitely would eventually produce unphysical decreasing energies. Spectroscopic constants can be fitted to measured lines or computed from a potential and nuclear model. The examples below use hypothetical constants to teach assignments and scaling, without presenting them as measured properties of a named molecule.
Work it through
Read a rotational ladder
A hypothetical polar diatomic has . Neglect distortion and spin. Find the J = 0, 1, 2 term values E/(hc), the first two dipole absorption line positions, and their separation.
The term values are , giving 0, 4, and for J = 0, 1, and 2. These are energies divided by h c.
The first two lines connect 0 to 1 and 1 to 2, so their wavenumbers are and .
Their separation is . Level spacings grow, yet the sequence of absorption line positions has a constant increment in the rigid model.
The term values are 0, 4, and 12 cm⁻¹; absorption lines lie at 4 and 8 cm⁻¹, separated by 4 cm⁻¹. These wavenumbers are not frequencies in hertz.
The living notebook
Explore the model
Interactive lab · quantum
Basis weights do not specify a rotor spectrum
Use two basis states as chosen J-level labels only. Reset, set Mixing angle θ = 0° and Relative phase φ = 0°, and predict one occupied basis component. For an independent run Reset, set θ = 180° and φ = 0°, and predict the opposite basis component.
- Probability |0⟩
- 71.1%
- Probability |1⟩
- 28.9%
- Bloch (x, y, z)
- 0.78, 0.45, 0.42
A normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.
Look forThe lab is a pure two-level Bloch model. It contains no J(J+1) ladder, thermal populations, degeneracy, selection rules, or rotational line calculation; the rotor spectrum comes from the written model.
Pause & reason
Check your understanding
Your turn
Try it yourself
A model diatomic changes from masses 2u and 6u to masses 6u and 6u, keeping the same separation. Its original rotational constant is . Find the new constant and the new J = 2 to 3 dipole absorption wavenumber.
Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.
Give me a hint
Compute each reduced mass, then apply inverse-mass scaling and take the difference between the two rotor terms.
Compare with the solution
The reduced masses are 1.5u and 3u, so the new constant is . The J = 2 and 3 terms are and , giving a line at . Equivalently it is . Nuclear-spin restrictions would need separate checking for an actual isotopic species.
Keep the idea
Take it with you
- Reduced mass and squared separation determine the diatomic inertia.
- Rotational term values and transition wavenumbers are different quantities.
- Dipole and Raman spectra probe different operators, while nonrigid corrections limit the elementary line pattern.
Read further
Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.
- NIST Diatomic Spectral Database: 1Σ ground states, equations 3–8 (mass scaling and rotational transitions)
- MIT 8.044: Indistinguishable Particle Effects in Rotational Raman Scattering, pp. 1–3
- Andrei Tokmakoff, MIT 5.74 Lecture 12, pp. 84–85 (permanent dipole, induced dipole, and anisotropic polarizability)
Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.
Lesson not marked complete.