advanced29 min studyLesson 49 in Physics

Gauge fields and quantum electrodynamics

Build a gauge-invariant matter coupling and separate redundant potentials from physical electromagnetic observables.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Check an Abelian gauge transformation with a consistent covariant derivative.
  • Distinguish potential components from physical photon polarizations.
  • Explain why gauge fixing and gauge-invariant observable checks are necessary.

Electromagnetic potentials contain useful information with deliberate redundancy. Gauge theory organizes that redundancy so that charged matter can interact locally with the electromagnetic field. Quantum electrodynamics combines a Dirac field, a gauge field, and this symmetry structure. The key is to distinguish a change of description from a measurable change of state, while treating boundaries and global charges with care.

Choose compatible signs once

Use natural units and metric (+−−−)(+---). Let qq denote the signed matter charge in the convention Dμ=∂μ+iqAμD_\mu=\partial_\mu+iqA_\mu. Choose ψ↦e−iqα(x)ψ\psi\mapsto e^{-iq\alpha(x)}\psi and Aμ↦Aμ+∂μαA_\mu\mapsto A_\mu+\partial_\mu\alpha. Differentiating the local phase produces a term proportional to ∂μα\partial_\mu\alpha, which the transformed connection cancels. The covariant derivative therefore transforms with the same phase as the matter field.

The field strength Fμν=∂μAν−∂νAμF_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu stays unchanged because mixed ordinary derivatives commute. The QED action combines its quadratic term with the Dirac kinetic term containing the covariant derivative. Expanding gives an interaction −qψˉγμψAμ-q\bar\psi\gamma^\mu\psi A_\mu. A book that reverses the derivative or phase convention can write a different-looking vertex sign; translating all definitions together resolves the discrepancy.

LQED=−14FμνFμν+ψˉ(iγμDμ−m)ψ,Dμψ↦e−iqαDμψ\mathcal L_{\mathrm{QED}}=-\frac14F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}+\bar\psi(i\gamma^\mu D_\mu-m)\psi,\qquad D_\mu\psi\mapsto e^{-iq\alpha}D_\mu\psi
The gauge transformation and signed charge convention are defined in the prose. With these choices, the matter–photon vertex is −iqγᵘ before attaching the external spinors and polarization vectors.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Redundancy is not an extra polarization

A four-component potential does not describe four independent propagating photon polarizations. Gauge freedom and constraints leave two transverse physical polarizations for a freely propagating massless photon in four-dimensional vacuum spacetime. The time component enforces a constraint in a canonical treatment; the division among components can depend on the gauge. Counting symbols before accounting for constraints gives the wrong physical state count.

Gauge fixing selects representatives so that propagators and perturbative calculations can be defined. It does not remove a physical polarization or allow a gauge-dependent intermediate field component to become a detector reading. In a covariant calculation, unphysical contributions cancel from suitable physical observables when the theory and calculation respect the gauge structure. Residual gauge freedom, boundaries, and zero modes require additional attention in a full treatment.

Aμ↦Aμ+∂μα,Fμν↦Fμν,Lgf=−12ξ(∂μAμ)2A_\mu\mapsto A_\mu+\partial_\mu\alpha,\qquad F_{\mu\nu}\mapsto F_{\mu\nu},\qquad \mathcal L_{\mathrm{gf}}=-\frac{1}{2\xi}(\partial_\mu A^\mu)^2
The last expression is a covariant gauge-fixing term with parameter ξ. It is a calculational prescription, not an additional measurable interaction with a new particle.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Check physical predictions, including infrared limits

A practical gauge-invariance check replaces an external photon polarization by its momentum in an appropriately assembled on-shell amplitude; the result should vanish under the applicable Ward identity. Individual diagrams may fail this check until all required terms are added. This tests the full coherent amplitude and conservation structure, rather than the artistic appearance of a diagram. Loop-level identities also demand a compatible regulator and renormalization procedure.

Gauge transformations that are trivial at the boundary are normally treated as redundancy. Transformations with nontrivial boundary behavior can instead be associated with physical charges; “every gauge transformation is unphysical” is too broad without boundary qualifications. QED also has soft-photon infrared subtleties: experimentally meaningful inclusive rates sum over unresolved radiation. Our tree-level construction introduces the theory’s grammar, while precise comparison with charged-particle scattering requires those additional ingredients.

A nonzero potential with zero local field strength

In simply connected flat spacetime, choose a smooth scalar α(x)\alpha(x) and let Aμ=∂μαA_\mu=\partial_\mu\alpha. Compute the field strength and transform the potential to zero using the convention above.

  1. Calculate Fμν=∂μ∂να−∂ν∂μα=0F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\alpha-\partial_\nu\partial_\mu\alpha=0 for smooth alpha. The potential may be nonzero, but its local electromagnetic field strength vanishes.

  2. Use gauge parameter β=−α\beta=-\alpha. Then Aμ′=Aμ+∂μβ=0A'_\mu=A_\mu+\partial_\mu\beta=0, while ψ′=eiqαψ\psi'=e^{iq\alpha}\psi changes the matter description consistently.

  3. The transformed covariant derivative has the same physical content, so no local force is created or removed by this change of representative. The simply connected and smooth assumptions exclude topological holonomy or singular-boundary complications; zero local field strength alone is not a universal global triviality theorem.

The result

The numerical value of a potential component is not by itself a local observable. Gauge-invariant fields and consistently transformed matter describe the same local physics.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · fields

Field patterns are not gauge representatives

Vary source strength q and rotation Ω in the softened two-dimensional vector field q r/(r² + ε) + Ω(−y, x). Compare radial flux-like behavior with circulation. Ask what extra equations would be needed to identify it with an actual electric or magnetic field.

Field patterns are not gauge representativesThe softened illustration is q·r/(r² + 0.2) + Ω(−y, x). Moving markers indicate local direction, not integrated particle paths or a Maxwell solution. Current readings: Fx at (1, 0): 0.833; Fy at (1, 0): 0.5; Field magnitude there: 0.972. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.−3.2−1.601.63.2−1.5−0.7500.751.5xyq = 1
Local field directionSource strength
Fx at (1, 0)
0.833
Fy at (1, 0)
0.5
Field magnitude there
0.972
t = 0 s

The softened illustration is q·r/(r² + 0.2) + Ω(−y, x). Moving markers indicate local direction, not integrated particle paths or a Maxwell solution. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThis vector-field sketch is not a Maxwell solution or a gauge transformation of Aμ. Changing its controls changes the displayed field, whereas changing a gauge representative leaves Fμν unchanged.

Check your understanding

Why does fixing a gauge not reduce a free photon below its two physical polarizations?

Try it yourself

Verify directly that Dμ′ψ′=e−iqαDμψD'_\mu\psi'=e^{-iq\alpha}D_\mu\psi for Dμ=∂μ+iqAμD_\mu=\partial_\mu+iqA_\mu and the stated transformations.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Expand the derivative of the position-dependent phase before combining terms.

Compare with the solution

The ordinary derivative gives e−iqα(∂μψ−iq(∂μα)ψ)e^{-iq\alpha}(\partial_\mu\psi-iq(\partial_\mu\alpha)\psi). The connection gives e−iqαiq(Aμ+∂μα)ψe^{-iq\alpha}iq(A_\mu+\partial_\mu\alpha)\psi. The two alpha-derivative terms cancel, leaving e−iqα(∂μ+iqAμ)ψe^{-iq\alpha}(\partial_\mu+iqA_\mu)\psi. This cancellation is the reason for matching the signs of the local phase and connection transformation.

Take it with you

  • A covariant derivative compensates the derivative of a local matter phase.
  • Gauge potentials contain redundancy; physical photon polarizations and observables do not depend on its arbitrary representative.
  • Ward identities, boundary charges, and infrared-safe observables refine the basic QED construction.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.