advanced28 min studyLesson 532 in Physics

An order parameter organizes amplitude, gradients, and gauge response

Minimize the local Ginzburg–Landau energy and identify physically meaningful phase combinations.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Minimize a homogeneous quartic free-energy density.
  • Track the units and normalization of a charged order parameter.
  • Construct a gauge-invariant phase gradient and current.

London theory describes screening while keeping the superfluid amplitude fixed. Ginzburg–Landau theory lets that amplitude vary, allowing boundaries, interfaces, and vortices to enter the same phenomenological framework. Its complex field has both magnitude and phase, but electromagnetic gauge freedom prevents an absolute phase from being a directly observable local quantity. We will minimize the simplest energy functional and use a gauge transformation to distinguish a change of description from a physical change of current.

Choose a normalization before interpreting the coefficients

Consider a single-component, isotropic Ginzburg–Landau functional near a continuous superconducting transition. Normalize Ψ so that its squared magnitude has units of effective pair density. With this convention α has energy units and β has energy times volume units. The gradient term uses an effective pair mass and the pair charge q=−2e. Other normalizations move factors among Ψ and the coefficients, so numerical coefficients cannot safely be compared across references without checking their definitions.

The local expansion contains the lowest even amplitude powers allowed by phase invariance, with positive β providing stability in this truncation. Near the mean-field transition α changes sign approximately linearly with temperature. Slowly varying fields justify retaining the leading squared covariant derivative. The functional is a coarse-grained approximation; strong fluctuations near criticality, large gradients, multiple competing components, or microscopic physics far below the transition can require additional terms or an entirely different description. Its effective density is not automatically an independently measurable count of tightly bound pairs.

fs−fn=α∣Ψ∣2+β2∣Ψ∣4+12m∗∣(−iℏ∇−qA)Ψ∣2+B22μ0,q=−2ef_s-f_n=\alpha|\Psi|^2+\frac\beta2|\Psi|^4+\frac1{2m^*}|(-i\hbar\nabla-q\mathbf A)\Psi|^2+\frac{B^2}{2\mu_0},\qquad q=-2e
f is an SI free-energy density in J/m³; |Ψ|² is normalized in m⁻³, α in J, β in J·m³, A in T·m, and m* in kg. The displayed magnetic term is the field-energy contribution to this functional; fixed applied-field thermodynamics requires the appropriate magnetic ensemble.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

The uniform minimum develops an amplitude

Set the magnetic field and gradients to zero and minimize with respect to the nonnegative variable n=|Ψ|². For positive α, the minimum is n=0. For negative α, stationarity gives n=−α/β, which is positive because β is positive. Substitution lowers the free-energy density by α²/(2β). The amplitude therefore grows with the square root of the distance below the mean-field transition when α is linear in temperature. This square-root law is a mean-field result rather than a universal statement about critical exponents.

A spatially varying phase adds kinetic energy even when the magnitude remains constant, but only through the covariant combination of phase gradient and vector potential. Write Ψ as its magnitude times exp(iθ). The current is proportional to that combination multiplied by charge and amplitude squared. A nonzero gradient of θ alone is not enough to identify a current without specifying A. Likewise a nonzero vector potential can be physically harmless when compensated by phase variation in a region with zero magnetic induction.

∣Ψ0∣2=−αβ(α<0),ps=ℏ∇θ−qA,js=qm∗∣Ψ∣2ps|\Psi_0|^2=-\frac\alpha\beta\quad(\alpha<0),\qquad \mathbf p_s=\hbar\nabla\theta-q\mathbf A,\qquad \mathbf j_s=\frac q{m^*}|\Psi|^2\mathbf p_s
Ψ₀ is the homogeneous zero-field minimum. pₛ is momentum per effective pair in kg·m/s and jₛ is in A/m². The current expression assumes the stated isotropic gradient coefficient and a smooth nonzero amplitude.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Gauge freedom is a redundancy of the description

Under A changing to A+∇χ, the phase changes to θ+qχ/ħ. These changes cancel inside the covariant momentum, leaving the magnetic field and current unchanged. Thus one should not describe the superconducting transition as literal spontaneous breaking of a local gauge redundancy. A chosen-gauge mean-field calculation often selects a complex phase, and relative phases enter interference experiments, but observable statements must be expressed through gauge-invariant correlations, currents, fields, or phase differences that include the vector-potential integral.

Use the vector lab only as a complex-amplitude picture. Reset and set both controls to angle zero degrees and magnitude one, predicting components (1,0). Reset and set angle 90 degrees and magnitude one, predicting (0,1). The magnitude stays one while its components rotate. This illustrates how changing a complex phase can leave the amplitude unchanged. The lab contains no vector potential and does not perform a gauge transformation or minimize a free energy; deciding whether a physical current changed requires information outside this geometric picture.

Minimize a rescaled uniform free energy

After specifying reference density and energy-density units, let the dimensionless homogeneous free energy be f=−2n+n²/2 for n≥0. Find the minimizing density, order-parameter magnitude, and condensation energy relative to n=0.

  1. Differentiate with respect to n: df/dn=−2+n. The stationary point is n=2, which lies in the physical nonnegative domain.

  2. The second derivative is one, so this stationary point is a stable minimum. The dimensionless order-parameter magnitude is √n=√2.

  3. Evaluate f(2)=−4+2=−2, whereas f(0)=0. The condensation lowers the energy density by two reference units.

The result

The minimum has effective density 2, magnitude √2, and free-energy density −2 in the declared rescaled units.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · vectors

Separate amplitude from its phase components

Reset and set BOTH controls to angle 0° and magnitude 1, predicting (x,y)=(1,0). Reset and set angle 90° and magnitude 1, predicting (0,1). This is complex-plane geometry, with no electromagnetic gauge field or GL minimizer.

Separate amplitude from its phase componentsPlayback traces a fixed vector and its projections. Angle and magnitude set the geometry; the moving marker does not change them. Current readings: x component: 1.393; y component: 0.975; Magnitude: 1.7. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.−7.46−3.7303.737.46−3.5−1.7501.753.5xyvvₓ = 1.39
Vectorx / y projectionsTrace marker
x component
1.393
y component
0.975
Magnitude
1.7
t = 0 s

Playback traces a fixed vector and its projections. Angle and magnitude set the geometry; the moving marker does not change them. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forThe magnitude can remain fixed while phase components change; the physical charged current needs the covariant phase gradient.

Check your understanding

Which quantity stays invariant under A→A+∇χ and θ→θ+qχ/ħ?

Try it yourself

In consistently rescaled units take ħ=1, q=−2, ∂xθ=3, and Aₓ=1. Apply a gauge change with ∂xχ=0.5. Compute the old and new covariant momenta, and state whether the current changes if the amplitude is fixed.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

Transform both Aₓ and ∂xθ. The phase-gradient change is q∂xχ/ħ, including the negative pair charge.

Compare with the solution

Initially pₓ=3−(−2)×1=5. The new potential is 1.5 and the new phase gradient is 3+(−2)×0.5=2. Therefore pₓ′=2−(−2)×1.5=5. The current q|Ψ|²pₓ/m* is unchanged. Changing only the phase gradient would describe a different physical configuration rather than this gauge transformation.

Take it with you

  • The order-parameter normalization fixes the units of GL coefficients.
  • The homogeneous quartic theory has a nonzero amplitude when α<0.
  • Currents depend on covariant phase gradients rather than absolute local phases.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.