Macroscopic quantum coherence

Connect phenomenology and microscopic pairing to superconducting electrodynamics, vortices, junctions, and neutral superfluid behavior.

10 published lessons1 module280 min of guided study
  1. 01
    Macroscopic quantum coherenceadvanced · 10 lessons

Follow the path or begin with a question. Every lesson is open.

Your notebook0 of 10 lessons completed

Your place, at your pace. Progress is optional and saved only in this browser when available.

Inside this module

Each lesson includes an interactive lab

Macroscopic quantum coherence

Connect phenomenology and microscopic pairing to superconducting electrodynamics, vortices, junctions, and neutral superfluid behavior.

  1. 01

    Magnetic screening requires more than perfect conductivity

    Derive the London penetration profile and distinguish equilibrium flux expulsion from frozen magnetic history.

    28 min
  2. 02

    An order parameter organizes amplitude, gradients, and gauge response

    Minimize the local Ginzburg–Landau energy and identify physically meaningful phase combinations.

    28 min
  3. 03

    Two length scales determine magnetic-interface behavior

    Relate GL amplitude healing and field penetration to type-I and type-II classification within its stated domain.

    28 min
  4. 04

    A Fermi surface changes the weak-attraction pairing problem

    Derive the logarithmic Cooper binding scale and state exactly what the frozen-sea model establishes.

    28 min
  5. 05

    A collective pairing state generates a self-consistent gap

    Track the weak-coupling BCS gap, transition scale, and density-of-states convention.

    28 min
  6. 06

    A quasiparticle mixes particle and hole amplitudes

    Diagonalize one BdG block and distinguish coherence weights, electron occupations, and thermal excitation probabilities.

    28 min
  7. 07

    Phase winding quantizes a fluxoid before it quantizes flux alone

    Derive the charged circulation condition and connect vortex cores, magnetic halos, and vortex density.

    28 min
  8. 08

    A gauge-invariant phase difference carries current through a weak link

    Connect dc and ac Josephson relations to the interference of two junctions in a low-inductance SQUID.

    28 min
  9. 09

    Phase rigidity and an energetic velocity threshold answer different questions

    Relate neutral superflow to phase gradients and state the limits of the Landau criterion and finite-temperature order.

    28 min
  10. 10

    Gap magnitude and gap sign require different experimental tests

    Use nodal thermodynamics and phase-sensitive interference as complementary evidence for pairing structure.

    28 min
All physics modules