research33 min studyLesson 549 in Physics

Topological superconductors and Majorana models

Analyze the Kitaev chain's bulk criterion and end operators while keeping BdG redundancy, fermion parity, and logical-state counting explicit.

On this page

What you’ll understand

  • Find the gapped topological regime of a spinless p-wave chain.
  • Identify unpaired Majorana operators at a solvable open-chain point.
  • Count parity-constrained states without treating one Majorana as an independent qubit.

A superconducting quasiparticle mixes electron creation and annihilation operators, so its low-energy structure differs from an ordinary number-conserving band. The Kitaev chain is a controlled model in which a gapped bulk accompanies localized end Majorana operators. These operators combine into nonlocal fermionic modes. Their state counting and robustness depend on parity, separation, and the superconducting environment; the phrase Majorana mode does not by itself supply a fault-tolerant qubit or establish a particular experimental material.

The bulk gap separates two regimes

Take a spinless nearest-neighbour chain with hopping t, chemical potential mu, and real nonzero p-wave pairing Delta. In the Nambu basis (ck,c−k†)T(c_k,c^\dagger_{-k})^T, its Bogoliubov–de Gennes Hamiltonian has a diagonal normal-state term and an odd-in-momentum pairing term. The spectrum is symmetric because the Nambu representation redundantly includes particles and holes. That redundancy is not the same as an extra independently occupiable physical band or an ordinary charge-conjugation symmetry of a number-conserving solid.

For nonzero pairing, gap closings occur when the pairing vanishes at zero or pi momentum and the normal coefficient also vanishes. The familiar topological interval is chemical-potential magnitude below twice the hopping magnitude. The interval is separated from the trivial regimes by a bulk gap closing. Pairing cannot simply be set to zero while retaining the same gapped statement: in that limit the interior interval generally contains a gapless normal metal.

HBdG(k)=(−μ−2tcos⁡k)τz+2Δsin⁡k τy,E±(k)=±(μ+2tcos⁡k)2+4Δ2sin⁡2kH_{\mathrm{BdG}}(k)=(-\mu-2t\cos k)\tau_z+2\Delta\sin k\,\tau_y,\qquad E_\pm(k)=\pm\sqrt{(\mu+2t\cos k)^2+4\Delta^2\sin^2k}
t, μ and real Δ are energies, k is dimensionless lattice momentum, and τ acts in the specified particle–hole Nambu space. For Δ≠0 the infinite clean chain is topological at |μ|<2|t|. E+ is the positive quasiparticle energy; the separation between the written ± branches is twice E+.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

A solvable pairing pattern leaves two end operators

Resolve each physical fermion into two Hermitian Majorana operators with anticommutator two. At zero chemical potential and pairing equal to positive hopping, the open-chain Hamiltonian pairs one Majorana on a site with one on the next site. The first A operator and final B operator are absent. They commute with this ideal Hamiltonian and form one ordinary zero-energy fermion when combined. Their Hermitian character does not make each one an independently occupiable particle state.

Away from the exactly solvable point but within the gapped phase, end wavefunctions remain localized for a sufficiently long clean chain. Overlap across a finite sample generally gives an exponentially small splitting rather than an exact zero. Local perturbations can also couple to additional nearby degrees of freedom. The protecting class-D distinction survives without the extra real-parameter symmetry of the displayed special model, provided the appropriate gap and fermion-parity assumptions remain valid.

γA,j=cj+cj†,γB,j=−i(cj−cj†),{γa,γb}=2δab,H=it∑j=1N−1γB,jγA,j+1(μ=0, Δ=t>0)\gamma_{A,j}=c_j+c_j^\dagger,\quad \gamma_{B,j}=-i(c_j-c_j^\dagger),\quad \{\gamma_a,\gamma_b\}=2\delta_{ab},\qquad H=it\sum_{j=1}^{N-1}\gamma_{B,j}\gamma_{A,j+1}\quad(\mu=0,\ \Delta=t>0)
The dimensionless fermion operators obey canonical anticommutation; each γ is Hermitian. N counts open-chain sites and t is an energy. The hopping and pairing convention is the one corresponding to the displayed BdG form. γA,1 and γB,N do not enter this solvable Hamiltonian.↔ Scroll wide equations horizontally.

Parity and the environment decide the usable state space

Two unpaired Majoranas define one fermionic mode with empty and occupied states of opposite fermion parity. If the total parity of an isolated system is fixed and no other zero modes are available, only one of those two occupations lies in the selected sector. Four separated Majoranas can encode two fermionic occupations; fixing their combined parity leaves a two-dimensional space. This is the minimal counting reason that a single end pair is not automatically one freely controllable fixed-parity qubit.

A grounded superconductor, a floating island with charging energy, and a system exchanging quasiparticles with a reservoir impose different parity and charge constraints. Poisoning events can change the sector and undermine an encoding. Adiabatic exchanges in suitable networks require additional controls and do not follow from merely plotting a two-level Bloch sphere. The ideal chain identifies a mechanism and a phase criterion; demonstrating protected operations requires an apparatus-specific model and evidence beyond a zero-bias spectral feature.

Count end states before calling them a qubit

An open four-site chain has μ=0 and Δ=t=1.0 meV at the solvable point. Identify the unpaired operators, the positive bulk quasiparticle energy, and the number of zero-mode states before and after fixing total parity. Compare with four unpaired Majoranas.

  1. The three bonds pair B1 with A2, B2 with A3, and B3 with A4. The unpaired operators are A1 and B4. They combine into f=(γA,1+iγB,4)/2f=(\gamma_{A,1}+i\gamma_{B,4})/2.

  2. The bulk formula gives E+(k)=2t=2.0E_+(k)=2t=2.0 meV at every k. Each paired Majorana bond has the same positive fermionic excitation scale; the exact end mode has zero energy at this chosen finite-chain point.

  3. The end fermion has two occupations across both parity sectors, but fixed total parity with a fixed bulk ground configuration retains only one. Four unpaired Majoranas instead give four occupation states, reduced to two by one fixed-total-parity constraint.

The result

The ends are γA,1 and γB,4, the paired-mode excitation energy is 2 meV, and one pair supplies two opposite-parity states rather than a fixed-parity qubit. Four Majoranas leave a two-state fixed-parity encoding.

Explore the model

Interactive lab

Interactive lab · quantum

A possible four-Majorana logical space

Only as a logical analogy, let |0L⟩=|00⟩ and |1L⟩=|11⟩ denote two fermion occupations with even combined parity. Reset and set both controls to θ=0° and φ=0°; predict logical-zero probability 1. For a fresh comparison, Reset and set both controls to θ=90° and φ=0°; predict equal logical probabilities in a coherent even-parity superposition.

A possible four-Majorana logical spaceA normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Current readings: Probability |0⟩: 71.1%; Probability |1⟩: 28.9%; Bloch (x, y, z): 0.78, 0.45, 0.42. All parameters are adjustable with the labeled controls below.xyz|0⟩|1⟩Basis probabilitiesP(0)71.1%P(1)28.9%
Bloch vector / P(0)P(1)Phase latitude
Probability |0⟩
71.1%
Probability |1⟩
28.9%
Bloch (x, y, z)
0.78, 0.45, 0.42
t = 0 s

A normalized two-level pure state, not an interacting field simulation. Playback adds one radian per second to the relative phase; basis probabilities stay fixed. Parameter changes pause playback and recompute the model at the current elapsed time. Reset restores both parameters and returns time to zero. Playback starts paused. Adjust either parameter, then choose Play or Step.

Look forA constrained two-dimensional logical space can be drawn as pure-qubit geometry. The lab has no Majorana operators, superconducting gap, parity detector, braiding controls, or protected-operation simulation.

Check your understanding

Two isolated Majorana end modes combine into one zero-energy fermion. If total fermion parity is fixed and the bulk is in a fixed ground configuration, how many of its occupations remain allowed?

Try it yourself

For a clean infinite chain set t=1.0 meV, Δ=0.50 meV, and μ=3.0 meV. Determine the phase and the minimum positive quasiparticle gap. Use c=cos k to minimize the squared energy.

Take a moment to make a prediction or work it out on paper. Open a hint when you need one.

Give me a hint

The topological criterion uses |μ| compared with 2|t|. For the gap, substitute sin²k=1−c² with −1≤c≤1.

Compare with the solution

Since 3>2, the phase is trivial. The squared positive energy in meV² is (3+2c)2+1−c2=10+12c+3c2(3+2c)^2+1-c^2=10+12c+3c^2. Its derivative 12+6c is positive throughout the interval, so the minimum occurs at c=−1 and equals one. Thus the minimum positive quasiparticle excitation is 1.0 meV at k=π. The separation of the displayed ± BdG branches there is 2.0 meV, a different gap convention that must not be confused with the excitation energy.

Take it with you

  • The Kitaev-chain criterion assumes nonzero pairing and a gapped bulk.
  • Two Majorana operators form one fermionic mode, with parity constraining its occupations.
  • Finite overlap, charging conditions, poisoning, and control protocols limit protection beyond the ideal model.

Read further

Original sources and deeper explanations to follow at your own pace.

Optional progress, saved in this browser when available. Revisit any lesson at any time.

Lesson not marked complete.